[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Vasya Pupkin
I have successfully cloned http://elinks.cz/elinks.git, built ELinks binary against OpenSSL and successfully opened https://metrocom-chat.ml with this binary. So I guess patch is applied or building against OpenSSL instead of GnuTLS did the trick. elinks@home:~/elinks/src$ ./elinks -verbose 2

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700283 Title: ELinks: SSL error with some websites To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
#797968 is more specific, as this bug is about the lack of the SNI extension. ** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #866015 => Debian Bug tracker #797968 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
As indicated in the Debian bug, elinks is missing the server name indication (SNI) extension. A debian bug about that specifically is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797968. That gut has a suggested patch, but looks like it was never applied to the debian package. There seems

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
#797968 is more specific, as this bug is about the lack of the SNI extension. ** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #866015 => Debian Bug tracker #797968 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2018-05-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
As indicated in the Debian bug, elinks is missing the server name indication (SNI) extension. A debian bug about that specifically is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797968. That gut has a suggested patch, but looks like it was never applied to the debian package. There seems

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2017-06-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: elinks (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700283 Title: ELinks: SSL error with some websites To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2017-06-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: elinks (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866015 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2017-06-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: elinks (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866015 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700283

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2017-06-26 Thread Vasya Pupkin
Done: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866015 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #866015 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866015 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1700283] Re: ELinks: SSL error with some websites

2017-06-26 Thread ChristianEhrhardt
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I was able to confirm the issue in Xenial-Artful and in Debian Sid/Stretch. This bug is present in Debian too, and Ubuntu currently doesn't make any changes over the Debian package. So this bug would be best