[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-10-24 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: binutils Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.8.2-1ubuntu8 --- network-manager (1.8.2-1ubuntu8) artful; urgency=medium * debian/network-manager.postinst: drop in an empty override file for NetworkManager to manage all devices for upgrade from any version, as long as

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.29-13ubuntu1 --- binutils (2.29-13ubuntu1) artful; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: - Build from upstream sources. binutils (2.29-13) unstable; urgency=medium * Build again all cross packages. binutils

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-19 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: binutils Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: binutils Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-18 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #22150 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22150 ** Also affects: binutils via

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-18 Thread Matthias Klose
I think there is at least a bug in network-manager: it defines (for whatever reason) an explicit_bzero function, which is not used when building with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE. The reference in string_erase is transformed from explicit_bzero to explicit_bzero_chk. So if network- manager defines

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-18 Thread Matthias Klose
test files at https://people.canonical.com/~doko/tmp/lp1715641.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dpkg (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #874585 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874585 ** Also affects: dpkg (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874585 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I believe this is a bug in dpkg, since it does not parse 'Version References:' paragraph of data. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Inspecting with readelf I see this: Version needs section '.gnu.version_r' contains 9 entries: Addr: 0x00010a80 Offset: 0x010a80 Link: 6 (.dynstr) 00: Version: 1 File: ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Cnt: 1 0x0010: Name: GLIBC_2.3 Flags: none Version: 20 0x0020: Version: 1 File:

[Bug 1715641] Re: network-manager built against glibc-2.26 requires GLIBC_2.25 symbol yet doesn't depend on recent enough glibc

2017-09-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
maybe Dpkg/Shlibs/Objdump.pm doesn't parse that section? Or maybe objdump output changed, hence the parsing fails? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715641 Title: network-manager