[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-04-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Override component to main pysmi 0.2.2-1 in bionic: universe/misc -> main python-pysmi 0.2.2-1 in bionic amd64: universe/python/optional/100% -> main python-pysmi 0.2.2-1 in bionic arm64: universe/python/optional/100% -> main python-pysmi 0.2.2-1 in bionic armhf: universe/python/optional/100% ->

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-04-05 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed pysmi version 0.2.2-1 as checked into bionic. This should not be considered a full security audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. - No CVEs in our database - pysmi can parse ASN1 mib files and emit json or python code to work with data in the described format; there's

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Override component to main pycryptodome 3.4.7-1 in bionic: universe/misc -> main 1 publication overridden. Override component to main python-pycryptodome 3.4.7-1 in bionic amd64: universe/python/optional/100% -> main python-pycryptodome 3.4.7-1 in bionic arm64: universe/python/optional/100% ->

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-29 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed pycryptodome version 3.4.7-1 as checked into bionic. This is not a full security audit, but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. I especially did not investigate if the implementations are properly constant-timed, free from leaks, implemented correctly, or suitable for purpose.

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-29 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks Steve, I've filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-crypto/+bug/1759985 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748572 Title: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome To manage

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Seth, it's a concern if the packages don't declares a Breaks or Conflicts with one another. If they don't (I'm not currently in a position to check), could you file a bug on them for this? If the incompatibility is declared, and proposed-migration says no packages are uninstallable as a result,

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-29 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello, One must avoid having both PyCrypto and PyCryptodome installed at the same time, as they will interfere with each other. Is this a concern for us? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-03-01 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Any progress on this review? This is blocking pyasn1*/python-ldap/389 -ds-base from migrating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748572 Title: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome To manage

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-20 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Seems to me like pysmi would potentially go parse and generate code from MIBs retrieved from the web (those are not necessarily known to be safe). I think this warrants some further code review. ** Changed in: pysmi (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu OpenStack (ubuntu-openstack) => Ubuntu Security

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-13 Thread Matthias Klose
please could you track the conversion of packages in main in a separate bug report using different tasks? ** Changed in: pycryptodome (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu OpenStack (ubuntu-openstack) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global- requirements.txt#L224 Some further context - this feels like a general ecosystem move to the fork: # NOTE(dims): pysaml 4.0.3 uses pycryptodome instead of pycrypto, for mitaka # we cannot switch to pycryptodome as many projects are

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
Subscribing ubuntu-security team due to pycryptodome and fork/nasty-ness -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748572 Title: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
Having pycrypto and pycryptodome both in main seems less than ideal but would like to get a steer from the security team on preference - the rationale for pycryptodome is that pycrypto is unmaintained. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
** Changed in: pycryptodome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: pysmi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: pycryptodome (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-18.02 ** Changed in: pysmi (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-18.02 -- You received this

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
** Changed in: pysmi (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Description changed: [Rationale] The new version of python-pysnmp4 adds dependencies on python- pycryptodome and python-pysmi, so these need to be MIRed. >> pysmi << [Availability] In universe [Security]

[Bug 1748572] Re: [MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome

2018-02-12 Thread James Page
bug subscriptions added for ubuntu-openstack team. ** Description changed: + [Rationale] + The new version of python-pysnmp4 adds dependencies on python- pycryptodome and python-pysmi, so these need to be MIRed. + + >> pysmi << + + [Availability] + In universe + + [Security] + +