I've synced 0.11.3-1 from experimental. Thanks!
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ken VanDine (ken-vandine) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
OK, so there is no longer any reason for me to avoid 0.11 in Debian
unstable? Thanks for checking. If that's your final answer, this bug can
be closed.
If you are going with 0.11.x, please consider syncing 0.11.3 (from
experimental for now).
It is possible that the stable branch resulting from
Considering that 0.10.x will most likely not get backported fixes all
the way through April 2023 it would be desirable to target 0.12 for
18.04. I confirmed with @sil2100 on IRC that we should be able to SRU
0.12 if we ship 0.11.x now. It would need to reviewed at the time, but
assuming it
I'm asking for some guidance from the SRU team. I'm personally in favor
of shipping 0.11.x with a plan to SRU 0.12 in 18.04, as I suspect that
isn't all that far off.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> I'm also trying to get some clarifications around why fedora 26/27
ship 0.10.X vs 0.11.X, I wonder if it was just the simplest thing to do
with the document portal move in 0.11.X. If I get any reasoning I'll
update this bug.
Fedora 26 and 27 started out with flatpak 0.9.x, so they transitioned
@smcv, thanks for the comment that is really useful info. I didn't
realize that debian had already split the document portal, this is good
to know.
I had some further discussions with people about the situation
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/gvFBxNFzwN/ (it's quite long). But
interesting points
> i *think* the even ones are considered LTS releases, not necessarily
> that the odd ones are unstable
0.10.x being described as a stable-branch is about the meaning of
"stable/unstable" that could be paraphrased as "doesn't change a
lot/does change a lot" (just like the Debian stable and
I'm also trying to get some clarifications around why fedora 26/27 ship
0.10.X vs 0.11.X, I wonder if it was just the simplest thing to do with
the document portal move in 0.11.X. If I get any reasoning I'll update
this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
So I had a short conversation on #flatpak about this (unfortunately Alex
is on holiday so can't provide any input at this current time).
Hi, I know alex isn't around, but was wondering if anyone else would
be able to answer this question. Are the odd series numbers truely development
series
I am not an Ubuntu developer, but my understanding of "new upstream
micro-releases" would be that it covers releases with targeted bugfixes,
like GLib 2.54.3 to 2.54.4, dbus 1.12.2 to 1.12.4, or flatpak 0.10.3 to
0.10.4. In some cases Flatpak 0.10.x also contains minor new features if
they are
Hey, as discussed in IRC on #ubuntu-desktop, I'm happy to help out with
any SRUs and maintenance where I can :-)
If Ubuntu stays on 0.11 for bionic, assuming there are no regressions
the SRU process, I'm right in saying SRU process would allow for bionic
users to upgrade to 0.12, or 1.0 at a
Thanks @smcv! I'm actually inclined to stick with 0.11.x for bionic.
I've heard there were complaints in the past about us tracking LTS for
flatpak which has evolved much in a short time. I'm also fine with
rolling back to 0.10.4 if you think that's best, but 0.11 seems to be
working well and we
Thanks Simon for the work you are doing and for reaching out/making sure
we do the right things, assigning to Ken who is going to sort that
situation out
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ken VanDine
I'm also packaging 0.11.3 now for experimental, so you might want to
sync that. Pull requests welcome at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak if you have packaging changes
that are not inherently Ubuntu-specific.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
14 matches
Mail list logo
