Please make sure to forward any deltas added for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
Title:
Remove gjs from s390x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I believe infinity (or someone like him) had a similar request the last
time we removed gjs/390x.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
Title:
Remove gjs from s390x
To manage
I think I would have pushed back on doing no-change rebuilds. I'm not
sure there's a precedent for that when doing arch-specific removals.
And I was planning to handle fixing packages that need it (in Debian,
then syncing/merging) to Build-Depend on gjs or something properly,
after we got the
Given that it happened the way it did, though, thanks for handling those
things. ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
Title:
Remove gjs from s390x
To manage notifications
Someone (probably didrocks?) will need to look into the ubuntu-make
autopkgtest on s390x. It depends on ubuntu-desktop and tries to use gdm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
The provides mixup didn't hurt since I didn't upload to the archive and
the Vcs revert was handled quickly. The rebuilds are ok to do though,
right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
OK, I just read a half uninformed rant in #ubuntu-release from last
night. It would be good to have those rants in future with some of the
parties involved up to that point. We could have avoided that mix up
with the provides, for example.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Some coordination would have been nice.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
Title:
Remove gjs from s390x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
infinity wants new uploads of all the packages that have had removed
binaries on s390x so that 1) the build log shows correctly as dep-wait
or failed and 2) so that the s390x binaries don't accidentally get
copied back to the archive.
I uploaded some of these to the cosmic unapproved queue
This is done now. I was planning to look into some followup uploads to
make sure things don't build uninstallable binaries (BD: gjs or similar)
** Changed in: gjs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Description changed:
Same deal as bug #1712083. This time it is for mozjs60:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs60/60.2.1-1
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909536
We want to upgrade to the final gjs release for GNOME 3.30, which
depends on the
** Description changed:
Same deal as bug #1712083. This time it is for mozjs60:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs60/60.2.1-1
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909536
We want to upgrade to the final gjs release for GNOME 3.30, which
depends on the
** Description changed:
Same deal as bug #1712083. This time it is for mozjs60:
- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs60/60.2.1-1
+ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs60/60.2.1-1
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909536
+
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gjs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794721
Title:
Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not going to do that either.
I will probably simply regenerate the metapackage after the removals
have happened. This will mean that there is no gnome-shell in ubuntu-
desktop on s390x, so the package will be a bit of a lie (doesn't provide
a "desktop") but it
I'd prefer that we consider moving ubuntu-desktop to a separate source
package so that we can easily fully drop s390x support there if we want
without having incorrect automatic changelog entries like this one. In
that version, ubuntu-desktop wasn't actually built for s390x:
16 matches
Mail list logo
