[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-08 Thread Steve Stalcup
** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Stalcup (vorian) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-07 Thread Daniel Holbach
Loïc: can you take a look at this one? -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi again Steve, (You seem to have the same -p1 issue in your interdiff which makes it harder to read. Also, you left over the bogus changelog entry which Emmet pointed out.) @Steve: if you look at the current version number of xdg-utils in Ubuntu, you'll see that there's no ubuntu1 suffix; this

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-03 Thread Steve Stalcup
** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: Steve Stalcup (vorian) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-02 Thread Emmet Hikory
** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: Steve Stalcup (vorian) = Emmet Hikory (persia) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: Emmet Hikory (persia) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Triaged -- xdg-util new upstream needs

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-02 Thread Emmet Hikory
Thanks for your work on this. I've unsubscribed ubuntu-universe- sponsors. The interdiff applies cleanly, and the resulting package compiles successfully. Unfortunately, this should be xdg-utils 1.0.2-0ubuntu1, as it is an Ubuntu local update. Further, it shouldn't have the Vcs-Git line in

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-02 Thread Steve Stalcup
Thanks Emmet. I have made the necessary changes. I also am attaching the new interdiff. ** Attachment added: xdg-utils_1.0.2-0ubuntu1.interdiff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8428/xdg-utils_1.0.2-0ubuntu1.interdiff.gz -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2008-01-02 Thread Steve Stalcup
oops ** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: Steve Stalcup (vorian) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Stalcup (vorian) -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2007-12-31 Thread Steve Stalcup
** Attachment added: xdg-utils_1.0.2-1.interdiff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11105381/xdg-utils_1.0.2-1.interdiff.gz -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 179606] Re: xdg-util new upstream needs packaging

2007-12-31 Thread Ralph Janke
** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Tags added: needs-packaging ** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- xdg-util new upstream needs packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179606 You received this bug notification because you