[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2020-09-23 Thread Tiago Stürmer Daitx
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We are sorry that we do not always have the capacity to look at all reported bugs in a timely manner. Oracle has dropped the leadership of the OpenJFX 8 project [1] and nobody else took it over, so it is pretty

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2020-05-15 Thread Kristian Rink
Personally, I have given up on that and moved to using sdkman (https://sdkman.io) for handling Java variants, this so far seems the best / most reliable way to get different Java versions (including 8.x series) to work on recent Linux distributions. Java packaging in Debian- based distributions

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2020-05-15 Thread Nathan Wonnacott
FYI, so far I have not found a way to compile openJFX 8 from source on Ubuntu 20.4. I've created this bug on openJFX to hopefully resolve that. https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8245065 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2020-05-13 Thread Nathan Wonnacott
Is there anyway we could increase the priority of this issue? The workaround of pinning to 8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 because that package no longer exists. There are MANY codebases out there that are still stuck in Java 8 and so far it seems that the only way to get openJFX with OpenJDK 8 is to compile

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2020-02-28 Thread Wolfgang Fahl
see https://stackoverflow.com/a/56166582/1497139 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-11-20 Thread Reuben Firmin
I attempted to compile JFX 8 from source manually, but it errors out. Can somebody try this and see if you can get any further? (I'm on 19.10). ``` # based on https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX, with updated gstreamer deps sudo apt-get install ksh bison flex gperf

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-08-08 Thread Kristian Rink
> Although that works, its quite an hack. Can't we have something like > openjdk-8-jfx, > openjdk-8-jfx-source, openjdk-11-jfx, ... It should possibly "just" be consistent. JavaFX *always* depends upon a particular JDK. Either make different versions of openjfx available for different openjdks

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-08-07 Thread Michael
@herrsaalfeld Instead of using apt-mark hold, I would recommend to rank the origin higher, so that in - the unlikely case - there will be an update published, it actually arrives. /etc/apt/preferences.d/openjfx Package: openjfx* Pin: release a=bionic Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: libopenjfx* Pin:

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-06-12 Thread herrsaalfeld
I would like to add that the proposed workaround to downgrade the openjfx packages is NOT a solution because no security updates will be available. The correct solution is to provide an openjfx-8 package as proposed by the TO or to roll back the openjfx package to version 8. The current openjfx

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-14 Thread 1proton
Thank you pascal, herrsaalfeld and others! This solution worked also for me on Ubuntu 18.10 when using Mediathekview. ps.:I had to reboot; maybe a logout/login would do it also BR -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-12 Thread pascal
This bug also effects the greenfoot project. Since the PPA ppa:webupd8team/java is discontinued, there is no way to run greenfoot under Ubuntu. I'm a teacher and it would be very helpful to have an openjfx-8 package so that i can run greenfoot. ``` $ greenfoot Exception in thread "main"

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-12 Thread pascal
ok. This works: ``` sudo apt install openjfx=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 libopenjfx-java=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 libopenjfx-jni=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 ``` -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title:

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-07 Thread Simon Levermann
It looks like this isn't going to happen: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910407#15 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #910407 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910407 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-06 Thread Kristian Rink
Hmmm, ok, I am unsure how Oracle and OpenJDK/JFX relate to each other, and whether the Open* variants will continue to see any community updates. The whole post-Java8-world still is a difficult thing to handle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-06 Thread Simon Levermann
I'm aware of this, I was merely pointing out that the lack of oracle updates for java 8 now removes one of the possible workarounds, making the only still-working workaround. I'm not familiar with the rules on the Ubuntu Bugtracker, but doesn't this effectively now make this a "security" bug?

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-06 Thread Kristian Rink
Yes, but the suggested approach ("Would it be possible to supply an openjfx-8 package, similar to the openjdk-{8,11}-{jdk,jre}?") would both fix this problem and make versioning of the openjdk- and openjfx- packages (which, despite being separate packages, are pretty closely tied to each other)

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-06 Thread Simon Levermann
As of a few weeks ago, Oracle will no longer supply free updates (security or otherwise) to oracle-jdk/jre-8. So now the only way to get Java 8-only applications, which still constitute a large portion is to use pinning of the openjfx package. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-03 Thread Kristian Rink
Stumbled into this problem here as well both with a couple of internal Java applications and some FLOSS apps such as mediathekview (https://mediathekview.de/) in Germany. Currently, Java 11 -> Java 8 downgrade or even installing both in parallel on any Ubuntu/Debian system works well, however for

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2019-05-02 Thread herrsaalfeld
On bionic, you will also have to downgrade libopenjfx-jni ``` sudo apt install openjfx=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 libopenjfx-java=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 libopenjfx-jni=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 ``` -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-12-24 Thread Simon Levermann
The problem with the "get oracle java" workaround is that oracle java is no longer free (as in beer): https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaseproducts/overview/javasesubscriptionfaq-4891443.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-20 Thread JPT
Workaround: get Oracle Java from https://launchpad.net/~webupd8team/+archive/ubuntu/java -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-19 Thread JPT
workaround: add bionic repo to your apt-sources: deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic universe maybe you should add "updates" or "security" repo too. test with or immediately pin with the file below sudo apt install openjfx=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 libopenjfx-java=8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 pin

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-19 Thread Vladimir Pichardo
I was able to copy the files from the openjfx package in 18.04 into my 18.10 manually and was able to launch Oracle SQLDeveloper which is what I needed the package for. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-19 Thread JPT
I've hidden my last comment because it's wrong. I confirmed the author of this bug is right. Yes, OpenJDK-8 cannot read the OpenJFX-11-Jars. Yes, Java-8 apps do not run in Java-11. But why does Jconsole report an empty/unavailable bootclasspath for OpenJDK-11? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-19 Thread David Pyke
Your app may be incompatible for other reasons. The app I'm working with shows an inability to load the javaFX libraries until I loaded them from old debs I pulled from Debian. Then I prevented them from being updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-11-19 Thread JPT
Are you sure about this? I just tried Java-11 in order to find out if my app is Java-11-compatible. The app crashed with the exact same exceptions which makes me think something else is wrong. It's telling it cannot find javafx/concurrent/Task which is contained in

[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8

2018-10-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: openjfx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: