[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2020-12-13 Thread Amr Ibrahim
** Changed in: gupnp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title: [MIR] gupnp To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2019-08-19 Thread Chris Coulson
I reviewed gupnp 1.2.1-1 as checked in to eoan. This isn't a full security audit, but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. - gupnp is a gobject based library for implementing and consuming UPnP services, and is required by Rygel. - It's part of the GNOME project. - It's written in C. - One

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2019-08-17 Thread Chris Coulson
** Changed in: gupnp (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title: [MIR] gupnp To

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2019-08-14 Thread Chris Coulson
This one could do with a quick review from the security team. ** Changed in: gupnp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2019-02-12 Thread Didier Roche
** Changed in: gupnp (Ubuntu) Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title: [MIR] gupnp To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-12-05 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The only binary we care about is 'libgupnp-1.0-4'.We can promote the documentation if that's standard practice but that's not needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title:

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-12-05 Thread Didier Roche
Thanks! Do you mind listing the exact binary package list which should then be promoted? Agreed with you on the autopkgtests. This could have helped if vala were to regressed the lib build, but unsure this is really needed as a separate autopkgtests. So, +1 for me, the security team should feel

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-12-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Same as gssdp, the doc/depends issue is fixed in 1.0.3-2 in Debian/going to be autosynced. The tests are not integration tests so unsure there is much value having them as autopkgtests? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-10-26 Thread Didier Roche
* -doc package: I think we should promote it as well in main, if the -dev is promoted. If so, this dep should be fixed: Depends: lynx | www-browser (first is lynx, in universe, www-browser is a virtual package not fullfiled?). In addition, it ships the doc in devhelp format (despite symlink

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-10-25 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Description changed: * Availability - Builds on all supported architectures in Ubuntu and on sync from Debian + Builds on all supported architectures in Ubuntu and on sync from Debian, + the package was in main in the past and needs to be re-promoted * Rationale We would like to

[Bug 1799974] Re: [MIR] gupnp

2018-10-25 Thread Didier Roche
** Changed in: gupnp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799974 Title: [MIR] gupnp To manage notifications about this bug