This bug was fixed in the package libosinfo - 1.4.0-0ubuntu1
---
libosinfo (1.4.0-0ubuntu1) disco; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1820986)
-- Didier Roche Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:35:36 +0100
** Changed in: libosinfo (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You
This bug was fixed in the package osinfo-db - 0.20190304-0ubuntu1
---
osinfo-db (0.20190304-0ubuntu1) disco; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1820986)
-- Didier Roche Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:02:38 +0100
** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix
OK, go for it as you both decide is best :>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820986
Title:
[FFe] Update *osinfo* to recent version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I don't expect high regression potential from the lib and the database itself,
as those are only metadata passing around and new functions won't be used.
It's also easily revertable as long as we don't upgrade GNOME Boxes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
laney, let me excerpt the gnome-boxes NEWS entries for you. Ubuntu 19.04
already has gnome-boxes 3.31.90.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-boxes/blob/gnome-3-32/NEWS
Or if you want to browse the commits:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-boxes/compare/v3.31.90...gnome-3-32
3.32.0.1 -
Thanks! I think this is *probably* fine.
Does Boxes itself require an exception? If so, it would make sense to
evaluate that request together with this one.
What kind of regression potential are we talking about here? If that's
acceptably low then this seems OK to me.
--
You received this bug
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820986
Title:
[FFe] Update *osinfo* to recent version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
