FYI, the Backports project restarted. Although we have yet to announce
it formally, you can find the new process here
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
I'm unsubscribing the backporters team from this bug since to me it
seems there is nothing to do by us, but if and when somebody is going
@gpiccoli,
One is the bug itself and the other one is the backport request "paperwork".
I guess we duplicate to kind of link them together.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827367
@gpiccoli,
One is the bug itself and the other one is the backport request "paperwork".
I guess we could mark them as duplicate to kind of link them together.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Eric, should this LP be marked as duplicate for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bionic-backports/+bug/1864212 ? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827367
Title:
rabbitmq-server
Discussion has been moved here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bionic-backports/+bug/1864212
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827367
Title:
rabbitmq-server outdated
To manage
3.6 is EOL since 31 May 2018.
3.7 is EOL'ing in 31 March 2020
which only leave 3.8 as supported
For more details:
https://www.rabbitmq.com/versions.html
rabbitmq-server (3.8.2) depends on erlang (21.3) which is the minimum
required which depends on elixir (1.6.6)
None of theses depends are
Hi Hadmut,
in rare cases where security maintenance is unbearable without upgrading this
is done by the security team. Otherwise as you suggested this would be a
package for backports pocket, but that is mostly a community effort.
I think there is no objection to help on that backport, but it
