[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2022-05-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: glibmm Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846699 Title: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-12-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Deleting the bionic target for now, it's unclear it's important enough for a SRU yet and it's missing a testcase which could be used to verify an update ** No longer affects: glibmm2.4 (Ubuntu Bionic) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-11-30 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Tags added: bionic ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glibmm/-/issues #33 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glibmm/-/issues/33 ** Also affects: glibmm via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glibmm/-/issues/33 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: glibmm2.4

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-11-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The way launchpad bug tracking is working is that the status reflect the current serie, and as you said it's fixed in 20.10. If the fix is needed in older serie it's possible to target an older serie which would add a line to the bug table. We do need to determine if the bug is important enough

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-11-30 Thread Alejandro Claro
Hi @Sebastien, I don't really understand the last comment. What do you mean by "However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed in the latest development version of Ubuntu."? The issue is present in the last version of the package for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. The problem is that we can NOT

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-11-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed in the latest development version of Ubuntu. This is a significant bug in Ubuntu. If you need a fix for the bug in previous versions of Ubuntu, please

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-11-30 Thread Alejandro Claro
HI, can someone please sponsor this patch or the upgrade of the Glibmm package to at least version 2.60? We have some products that are affected by this problem, and we can not upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04 yet. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-07-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "Patch for version 2.56 that incorporates a fix related to the theme management in version 2.60" seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-07-06 Thread Alejandro Claro
Patch for version 2.56 that incorporates a fix related to the theme management in version 2.60 ** Patch added: "Patch for version 2.56 that incorporates a fix related to the theme management in version 2.60"

[Bug 1846699] Re: Missing mechanism in Glibmm that prevents the support of some themes (CSS) in Gtkmm

2020-07-06 Thread Alejandro Claro
Can anybody look at this issue? We have a patch to solve this in the Ubuntu 18.04 package (version v2.56) and we are also able to compile and use version 2.60. However, we will like to be included in the official distribution files. This simplifies our deployment. If we provide the patch of the