[Expired for dovecot (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189354
Hello Luke,
Did you perhaps try the same setup on Ubuntu Xenial or Focal? If the
behavior of Dovecot changed between releases then we'd have a action to
take on the Ubuntu side: look for the change that introduced (or fixed)
the problem in the past versions of the dovecot package and evaluate the
Upstream's mailing list was very unhelpful. I'm essentially stuck on
this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893543
Title:
dovecot is not parsing the variables in dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
Hello Luke,
Based on the discussion posted, I could not infer if you have progressed
in diagnosing the issue, or if you're still stuck. Do you have more
news about the bug that you can share with us? Thanks.
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893543
Title:
dovecot is not parsing the variables in dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
correctly
[Expired for dovecot (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189354
Those list posts both speak to working dovecot configurations (dovecot
is working for imap) where the doveadm command does not work. The
above snippets are from my /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext file which
is referenced by /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-ldap.conf.ext file. Thus my
imap connection
There is a reference to a similar issue, of uo=%d,... resulting in
uo=,... here:
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-June/096513.html
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-June/096518.html
The latter suggests there are some search modes (e.g. -A) where there
isn't a domain defined for
