[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-02-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Override component to main rpi-eeprom 11.3-1ubuntu1 in hirsute: multiverse/misc -> main rpi-eeprom 11.3-1ubuntu1 in hirsute arm64: multiverse/misc/optional/100% -> main rpi-eeprom 11.3-1ubuntu1 in hirsute armhf: multiverse/misc/optional/100% -> main 3 publications overridden. ** Changed in:

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-02-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Override component to main raspberrypi-userland 0~20200520+git2fe4ca3-0ubuntu3 in hirsute: universe/libs -> main libraspberrypi-bin 0~20200520+git2fe4ca3-0ubuntu3 in hirsute arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% -> main libraspberrypi-bin 0~20200520+git2fe4ca3-0ubuntu3 in hirsute armhf:

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Set the states to be ready for the AAs per [1]. This should resolve soon'ish. [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess?action=show=MIRTeam#Process_states -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Ok clarified, and good - thanks Dave! All former concerns are resolved AFAICS. Therefore since all else was ready let use mark this ready for promotion (and after all this also is one of the cases that we kind of "already support but want to make official"). ** Changed in: raspberrypi-userland

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
We have assigned doko to re-review, but he is too often lost in too important bugs (e.g. today in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakeroot/+bug/1915250). So I want to help here by doing the re-review. The builds of

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-01-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: raspberrypi-userland (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137 Title: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: raspberrypi-userland (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137 Title: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland To manage

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-01-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
** Changed in: raspberrypi-userland (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137 Title: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland To manage

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-01-14 Thread Brian Murray
Comment #16 was inappropriately added due to the following in the linux- firmware-raspi2 changelog: * Replaced postinst with flash-kernel trigger (relates to LP: #1895137) So please ignore it, sorry for the noise! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2021-01-11 Thread Dave Jones
The userland packages in the following PPA should address all points raised by doko in the review in comment #13: https://launchpad.net/~waveform/+archive/ubuntu/userland I'm happy to attach a debdiff if that's preferable, but given the scale of the changes I'm not sure that'd be easier to

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2020-12-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI in MIR meeting of today: [16:44] waveform: I wanted to know if this is incomplete as in "ack I'll do it at some point" or as in "we'll give u then" [16:44] cpaelzer, that's basically done - I've just got to update the bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2020-10-16 Thread Matthias Klose
raspberrypi-userland: things which have to be fixed: - the debian/copyright is incomplete. an fgrep -ri copyright shows missing copyright holders, although these might not be extensive. Please also check for possible missing copyright holders which are not covered by the simple check

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2020-10-16 Thread Dave Jones
Thanks Seth, > Security team ACK for promoting rpi-eeprom to restricted CONDITIONAL > on another team stating that they will provide testing resources and > periodically import updated versions as appropriate. Foundations team will handle regular importing of updated versions, and SRUing to all

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom; raspberrypi-userland

2020-10-15 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed rpi-eeprom version 9.0-1ubuntu1 as checked into groovy. This isn't a full security audit but a very quick gauge of maintainability. Because this is an architecture-specific review, the usual tooling doesn't work for this case. This is a slight problem for maintenance, because the

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-10-07 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: + = rpi-eeprom = + [Availability] The package is in proposed, pending a correction to Architecture to permit it to migrate to multiverse (LP: #1884748). [Rationale] The package is required for updating the boot EEPROM on the Raspberry Pi 4. [Security] I

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-10-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks Dave and Dimitri! Former issues: - subscription - done - install in other places is now working fine The service fails (split to bug 1898160), but that isn't too bad as at least no half-installed packages are happening anymore. - updated to the most recent version - version depends on

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-10-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Arr I forgot, we still wait for Securtity on rpi-eeprom. But ok, the MIR Ack you have - it can go to Fix Committed as soon as they are happy as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@christian updated rpi-eeprom is now in groovy, and it is now "done right". ** Changed in: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package rpi-eeprom - 9.0-1ubuntu1 --- rpi-eeprom (9.0-1ubuntu1) groovy; urgency=medium * Ubuntu port (LP: #1884748), including changes for MIR (LP: #1895137) * Added d/watch * Added d/p/use_python3_no_env.patch to remove env from rpi-eeprom-config *

Re: [Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
> > - Please consider updating to a newer version before you SRU things to > >=Focal > > Is it best at this point to fix the existing 7.8 upload, or reject that > and fix all this in a new 9.0 upload? Happy to do whichever is easier > from the MIR/security team's perspective. IMHO cancel what is

Re: [Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
> > - You refer to an empty VCS, having the changes commit-by-commit in this or > > another one (depending where you push) woud be great. Please fix the VCS > > entry to point at such a valid repo. > > Ah, I was under the misapprehension that the launchpad repo would be > populated by the

Re: [Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
> Just to clarify, is this suggesting it should install cleanly on non-pi > arm hardware, but *then* refuse to work (with some appropriate error > message) or should it refuse to install at all e.g. at dependency > resolution time. I'd love to implement the latter but I've no idea how > (is there

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-16 Thread Dave Jones
> This one is hard to decide as it has binary blobs in the form of > the RPI firmware. Usually for normal package that would be a denial > reason, but other microcode delivering packages work the same way. Just a quick note on this one, in case it changes anything: as rpi- eeprom is currently

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI: Fused the thematically and use-case wise raspberry-userland MIR with the bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137 Title: [MIR] rpi-eeprom To manage notifications about

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
[Summary] This one is hard to decide as it has binary blobs in the form of the RPI firmware. Usually for normal package that would be a denial reason, but other microcode delivering packages work the same way. I'll need to discuss and co-ack with other MIR Team members and also need security to

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Also affects: raspberrypi-userland (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: [Availability] The package is in proposed, pending a correction to Architecture to permit it to migrate to multiverse (LP: #1884748). [Rationale] The package is required

[Bug 1895137] Re: [MIR] rpi-eeprom

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895137 Title: [MIR] rpi-eeprom To manage