please reopen if this is still an issue
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
MTU is not set on vlan
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
Sadly, the journalctl logs don't go back that far now.
It failed on a baremetal server, not a cloud.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
MTU is not set on vlan interface
This looks kind of similar to LP: #1888726
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
MTU is not set on vlan interface
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I can't reproduce it, on a VM with similar config the vlan does get the
right mtu. can you provide your systemd-networkd journal log? Is there a
specific environment (e.g. specific cloud) this fails in?
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug
Hello,
I don't need it on bond-manlan for sure (MTU 1500 on this one and its VLANs),
but I read in several place that setting MTU on the bond would also set it on
interface members.
And that indeed worked correctly.
As I said, I think the issue is definitely more in the udevd/networkd
part
this could be udevd/networkd bug which both fiddle with mtu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
MTU is not set on vlan interface
To manage notifications about this bug go
I wonder if you need more mtu settings on:
* ens10f2
* ens10f3
* bond-manlan
I don't think that MTU is allowed to be higher on a vlan, than on bond-
man, than on physical interfaces. Why did you not set mtu: 9000 on bond-
manlan?
however that does not explain how come the vlans on top of
