This bug was fixed in the package fwupd - 1.5.11-0ubuntu2
---
fwupd (1.5.11-0ubuntu2) impish; urgency=medium
* Compile with the flashrom plugin in Ubuntu now that flashrom is
in main (LP: #1912371)
-- William 'jawn-smith' Wilson Tue, 29
Jun 2021 10:08:47 -0500
** Changed
Override component to main
flashrom 1.2-5 in impish: universe/electronics -> main
flashrom 1.2-5 in impish amd64: universe/electronics/extra/100% -> main
flashrom 1.2-5 in impish arm64: universe/electronics/extra/100% -> main
flashrom 1.2-5 in impish armhf: universe/electronics/extra/100% -> main
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libftdi1 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
This patch enables fwupd to build with the flashrom plugin enabled on
Ubuntu.
** Patch added: "lp1912371_fwupd_build_with_flashrom.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+attachment/5507958/+files/lp1912371_fwupd_build_with_flashrom.debdiff
--
You received
We clarified that Doko on 2021-03-11 really meant to MIR-ack the check on
libftdi.
Thereby this is now actually fully ready and waiting for an upload of fwupd to
pull it in.
Updating the state accordingly.
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in:
That should fix the udev rules issue.
** Patch added: "Lintian Cleanup with udev fix"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+attachment/5502490/+files/lp1912371_lintian_cleanup.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Yes, they were included in the package twice. Once in
debian/flashrom.udev and once in util/z60_flashrom.rules. The
debian/flashrom.udev was causing a lintian warning, so I removed that
and added a section to meson.build that installs z60_flashrom.rules to
the correct location in a way that
@jawn-smith: was the removal of the udev rules intentional?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom + libftdi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The attached patch cleans up the lintian warnings and errors in
flashrom.
** Patch added: "Lintian Cleanup"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+attachment/5502234/+files/lp1912371_lintian_cleanup.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Package changed: libftdi (Ubuntu) => libftdi1 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom + libftdi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
yes, disabling lto explicitly for the build seems reasonable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom + libftdi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This debdiff corrects the accidentally left in debug statement and adds
`optimize=-lto` to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. Tests are succeeding again.
** Patch added: "lp1912371_v2.debdiff"
Hi,
I thought we had deactivated the github bugtracker because flashrom
development does not happen at github.
The github mirror of flashrom is there purely for people who are
unwilling or unable (due to corporate restrictions etc.) to download the
source code from our self-hosted git trees. I'll
On Wed, 19 May 2021 06:52:55 -
Alex Murray <1912...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> These failures of the mocked tests have been reported upstream at
> https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/186 by others but no
> response
Hi there,
I was the flashrom maintainer till a few years ago.
These failures of the mocked tests have been reported upstream at
https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/186 by others but no
response - however I am pretty sure this is due to the use of LTO in
impish - cmocka is known to fail with LTO due to the use of --wrap which
doesn't play nicely with
I am trying to do the security review of flashrom for this MIR but
currently it FTBFS with the attached debdiff in comment 9 - the build
log is attached. Can this please be resolved (along with removing the
'WILLIAM we're doing tests!' part of the output :)
** Attachment added:
I have reviewed flashrom along with fwupd and I don't see anything that
looks like it will cause problems. The flashrom documentation recommends
using vendors' flashing utilities when possible for laptops, and there
is a link to that page of the documentation in the manpage.
I have attached a
** Changed in: libftdi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthieu Clemenceau (mclemenceau) => Ubuntu Security Team
(ubuntu-security)
** Changed in: libftdi (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
[Summary]
This package is safe to include in main.
This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main:
* ftdi-eeprom
* libftdi1-2
* libftdi1-dev
* libftdi1-doc
* libftdipp1-3
* libftdipp1-dev
* python3-ftdi1
@paelzer, Sorry for dropping this, I saw the ping this morning on
ubuntu-meeting,
I'll put this in front of the team for review. I missed the notification.
Thanks for the reminder.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Summary]
MIR Team Ack under the constraint to implement the all Required (and as much
Recommended as possible) of the lists below.
This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main: libflashrom1
Required TODOs:
-
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
[Adding flashrom mailing list to CC. Context: The Ubuntu bug is about
moving flashrom from universe to main.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/ for
details.]
If anyone is interested, I can dig up my test scripts which I used to
test flashrom, but I do not have
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom
To manage notifications
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthieu Clemenceau (mclemenceau) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom
To manage
I do see now that there are built in tests, so I will update the
description. There is no debian/tests file so I will leave that part in.
Thanks for the input!
** Description changed:
[Summary]
- There are a few issues before we can MIR this package. The package does not
have a test suite
flashrom does have built-in self tests and also supports external tests,
but apparently that is not well-known.
If your build VM supports flash chip host controller emulation and flash
chip emulation, you can run flashrom with root privileges against the
emulated hardware.
If you want to run
** Description changed:
+ [Summary]
+ There are a few issues before we can MIR this package. The package does not
have a test suite that runs at build time, nor does it have a test suite that
runs as autopkgtest.
+
[Availability]
Currently in universe.
+
+ [Duplication]
+ There is no
@Christian, yes it makes sense for Foundations to own this package.
I'll subscribe the team and move set the status back to new.
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Tags added: fr-1087
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Matt - Foundations is the owner of fwupd - do you agree to own this package as
well then?
If yes please subscribe the Team and set the status back to "new" for a full
review.
If no - we need to have a discussion about the alternatives.
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
32 matches
Mail list logo
