[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-26 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-26 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110 Title: dhcp option 121 & 249 To manage notifications about this bug go to: htt

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-26 Thread Matthieu Clemenceau
** Tags added: fr-2416 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110 Title: dhcp option 121 & 249 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/193

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-20 Thread Matt Heller
I'll also add that installers for past LTS Ubuntu releases do work in our environment. I opened up the Focal initrd.gz we use for PXE based installs (I think it was from the mini.iso which I guess is now classified as a "Legacy Image", http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/installer- a

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-20 Thread Matt Heller
The Ubuntu Jammy installer initrd is missing the /etc/dhcp/dhclient- exit-hooks.d/rfc3442-classless-routes hook for dhclient. The /sbin/dhclient-script included in the initrd assumes the hook is present and if the "rfc3442_classless_static_routes" DHCP is sent by the DHCP server it ignores the the

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-19 Thread sascha arthur
Funny thing is that the rfc 3442 is from 2002. Thats what makes me wonder of the missing support till today... My workarround till today is to unzip the iso -> kernel+initrd, patch the initrd, and use the patched initrd. I would not recommend anyone to do it like that, only if theres no other op

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-19 Thread Dan Bungert
** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110 Title: dhcp option 121 & 249 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-19 Thread Mathew Binkley
I just wanted to say that we are also hitting the same problem (lack of dhcp option 121/249). So Subiquity connects to the network, but can't get a default route and thus fails. Couple this with the removal of debian-installer support from Ubuntu, and we can no longer install Ubuntu Jammy LTS.

[Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-05-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110 Title: dh