[Bug 2054826] Re: screen log filename length is capped at 70 characters

2024-03-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This can be reproduced in noble. I don't particularly think this is a bug either but rather an undocumented design decision. Imre, I think the best action here is to ask upstream to change the value higher, or to document the max character length better. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2054826] Re: screen log filename length is capped at 70 characters

2024-02-29 Thread Imre Péntek
seems like screen -S "$magic" -Logfile "${screen_logfile}" is not a drop-in replacement for screen -S "$magic" -X colon "logfile ${screen_logfile}^M" in my use case, at least for the time being, logfile is expected to be set after the session is already created also, my terminal windows are 166

[Bug 2054826] Re: screen log filename length is capped at 70 characters

2024-02-26 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Hi Imre, This seems to be truncated due to the width of your terminal window, since "colon" is used as a command through the window and it does not span new lines when a command is longer than the window witdh. However, there is a -L option you could pass to screen to set a new logfile name

[Bug 2054826] Re: screen log filename length is capped at 70 characters

2024-02-25 Thread Imre Péntek
as a workaround you can make a softlink to your logfile. the length of the filename of the actual logfile doesn't matter, the length of the filename of the softlink should be below 70 chars. And make your screen to log into the softlink -- You received this bug notification because you are a