[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-12-01 Thread Daniel Hahler
thoralf, see bug 303199 for this. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubu

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-12-01 Thread thoralf
once again an issue after the hardy heron kernel update from 2.6.24-21 to -22. the modules don't seem to be in hardy-proposed, either ... that's not exactly what i'd call long term support :-| -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug no

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu) Target: ubuntu-8.04.1 => None -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Copied to hardy-updates. ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-28 Thread René Vangsgaard
Confirmed here on Hardy 64-bit as well - why would you release a kernel that breaks something in the repositories? -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread clickwir
Oh crap, 20 days later and it's still not in there??? Is this normal for it to take so long? Confirmed here too, proposed works. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread SilverWave
Hardy proposed works for me too. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread Daniel Hahler
Marking as verification-done and subscribing ubuntu-archive - hoping that this is appropriate. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread erstazi
the hardy proposed works for me -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubunt

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread Magnus
Hardy proposed works for me too. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-27 Thread Everett Guerny
Works for me, too. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Daniel Hahler
Gene, "modprobe" is only a shortcut to "insmod", but apparently needs updates "deps" (what depmod generates). I've missed the "sudo" in the commands I've given you to try, sorry for the confusion. In fact, not "insmod" does survive the reboot, but now "modprobe vboxdrv" (as root in the init scri

Re: [Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Gene Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, so I ran sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko > again to get virtualbox working again then your command : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv > FATAL: Error removing vboxdrv > (/lib/modul

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Gene Caldwell
@Daniel hummm, ok, so I decided to see if I could survive reboots after the "sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko" now that I ran "sudo depmod" manually and it actually does survive reboots nowI booted twice and virtualbox is working without errors now,,, @Lucian

Re: [Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Gene Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @daniel > > this is the output of your request: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo depmod > [sudo] password for gene: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe vboxdrv try: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ s

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Gene Caldwell
ok, so I ran sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko again to get virtualbox working again then your command : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv FATAL: Error removing vboxdrv (/lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko): Operation not permitted so I guess that I am

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-11 Thread Gene Caldwell
@daniel this is the output of your request: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo depmod [sudo] password for gene: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe vboxdrv FATAL: Error inserting vboxdrv (/lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko): Operation not permitted -- no

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-10 Thread Daniel Hahler
Gene, please check if running "sudo depmod" manually allows you to use "modprobe" afterwards (e.g. "modprobe -r vboxdrv" to remove the module and "modprobe vboxdrv" to insert it.) Depmod gets run on package installation, but maybe that failed somehow?! -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic h

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-10 Thread Gene Caldwell
after rebooting I get the following error: VirtualBox kernel driver not installed. The vboxdrv kernel module was either not loaded or /dev/vboxdrv was not created for some reason. Please install the virtualbox-ose-modules package for your kernel, e.g. virtualbox-ose-modules-generic.. VBox statu

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-08 Thread Gene Caldwell
ok, IP is now found and package was installed. However not successfully installed. To get VirtualBox to run, I had to issue the following command : sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko that I found in another thread which solved my problem and VirtualBox is now running on .17

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-08 Thread Gene Caldwell
ok, its finally there, however I get the following error when trying to retrieve from synaptic : W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/virtualbox-ose-modules/virtualbox-ose-modules-generic_24.0.1_amd64.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.46 80] -- no module built

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
(if that wasn't clear, I mean that the packages have been approved through the new queue now) -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
you could just ping an archive admin to request new processing, no need to set the bug state back to 'fix committed'. ;) ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-07 Thread Daniel Hahler
The binary packages are now waiting in the NEW queue (https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue) (since 18 hours). You could already install the .deb manually from there (e.g. using GDebi or "sudo dpkg -i") - or just wait some more.. :) ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu)

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-07 Thread Gene Caldwell
@Daniel I just checked to see if the release is available yet and it does not look like it is. your links show that it was compiled last night or the job ran, I'm not real sure if it ran clean or not, there was too much for me to understand in the logs. anyway, I'm not rushing because I took you

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-06 Thread Daniel Hahler
The package is queued for building (since 18 hours already, see https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/virtualbox-ose-modules/+builds). The build daemons (https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds) appear to be busy building all the packages for Intrepid. So you "just" have to wait. As a worka

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-06 Thread Gene Caldwell
I am writing this 16 hours after the post directly above this post, so it looks like 16 hours later the 24.0.1 version is still not there ( no .17 kernel ) is that right ? -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here ** Tags added: verification-needed -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Hahler
Jordi, thanks for catching my mistake. I've re-uploaded it as 24.0.1 for hardy-proposed, now waiting for approval. -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Jordi R
Will this package be uploaded to the Hardy repositories? I see in the changelog that is targeted for Intrepid. virtualbox-ose-modules (24.1) __intrepid__ ; urgency=low -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package virtualbox-ose-modules - 24.1 --- virtualbox-ose-modules (24.1) intrepid; urgency=low * Rebuild for 2.6.24-17 (LP: #226753) -- Daniel Hahler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 05 May 2008 17:12:54 +0200 ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu)

Re: [Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Rheinbay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can confirm this issue. Though we should be able to build our own > modules based on virtualbox-ose-source I tried `apt-get source --compile virtualbox-ose-source` but it complaied: ... dpatch apply-all applying patch 0

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread serenis
Any idea when the kernel modules will be released? Thanks JK -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hahler (blueyed) Status: Confirmed => In Progress Target: None => ubuntu-8.04.1 -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You r

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread jad_jay
Yes there is no vbox module for 2.6.24-17 kernel... -- no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 226753] Re: no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Rheinbay
Can confirm this issue. Though we should be able to build our own modules based on virtualbox-ose-source using module-assistant, I'd love to see updated packages in the repos. What's the official approach to do that? Thanks, Daniel ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose-modules (Ubuntu) Status: New