[Bug 241544] Re: pdf2ps creates empty output

2008-06-24 Thread Till Kamppeter
StefanS42376868, if you want the usage of Ghostscript tools getting standardized and the man pages improved, feel free to report an upstream bug/feature request on http://bugs.ghostscript.com/. -- pdf2ps creates empty output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241544 You received this bug

[Bug 241544] Re: pdf2ps creates empty output

2008-06-24 Thread JM Williams
I see the non-standard behaviour of the ghostscript tools as quite troublesome, because they are likely to be used in conjunction with tools such as those provided by psutils, which behave as standard Unix text processing utilities. This can lead to awkward pipelines such as the following, which

[Bug 241544] Re: pdf2ps creates empty output

2008-06-23 Thread StefanS42376868
Thanks a lot, that does it! But as you mentioned, the documentation is misleading. Of course I had read man pdf2ps before I submitted the problem report, but I expected that a missing output argument would automatically be substituted by stdout. Maybe you can add a hint in the man page? --

[Bug 241544] Re: pdf2ps creates empty output

2008-06-22 Thread JM Williams
I think you will find the file ~/Report_a_bug_about_Ubuntu.ps containing the output you wanted. pdf2ps’s man page gives usage as: pdf2ps [ options ] input.pdf [output.ps] What it doesn’t mention is that if output.ps is not specified, input.ps will be automatically created in the current