[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2014-11-21 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Hardy has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the Hardy task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: glom (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2009-08-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/glom -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2009-02-19 Thread Murray Cumming
Sorry, I see now that Glom has 1.6.17, which is the latest. Many thanks for making that happen. -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2009-02-19 Thread Murray Cumming
Is there any way to make this update actually happen? -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-12-31 Thread Iain Lane
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: glom + Glom 1.6.17 is a bugfix release to the version, 1.6.14 that we have in + Hardy. Changes: - There are several important bug fixes in upstream stable Glom. For - instance: + 1.6.17 (stable): + * Just a build fix. + Bug #531983 (Funda

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-12-31 Thread Iain Lane
** Attachment added: Correct version http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20829467/glom_1.6.17-0ubuntu1.1.diff.gz ** Description changed: Glom 1.6.17 is a bugfix release to the version, 1.6.14 that we have in Hardy. Changes: 1.6.17 (stable): * Just a build fix. Bug #531983 (Funda

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-10-28 Thread Luca Falavigna
** Changed in: glom (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed = New -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-10-02 Thread Iain Lane
I guess it's everything that worked before still works now. Now obviously nobody is going to test *everything*, so I guess as long as anyone verifying the SRU doesn't find any new breakage then we should be fine. -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-09-26 Thread Murray Cumming
Out of interest, how you decide that there are no regressions? -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-09-25 Thread Iain Lane
I've talked to Sebastien Bacher about this and he said that the qualifier for new upstream bugfix releases being SRUed is just that there are no regressions. With this in mind, I'm going to ask for the SRU to be uploaded. Go for it, motu-sru! ** Changed in: glom (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: Iain

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-28 Thread Murray Cumming
I thought that the new SRU process allowed updates to new stable application versions in stable Ubuntu, without splitting it up into patches and imagining that you are capable of reviewing those patches. -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-28 Thread Iain Lane
Devid, I've spoken with someone in MOTU-SRU (Luca) about this and it's fine to accept an upstream bugfix release providing it is that and doesn't introduce any new features. There's no problem with this providing that there are some testcases which SRU verifiers can use. I don't know if there's a

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-27 Thread Jordan Mantha
** Tags removed: uus-pre-ff-810 -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-27 Thread Devid Antonio Filoni
Iain, if possible you should include only patches that fix important bugs, not upload it to the new version (I'm talking about SRU). -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-22 Thread Luca Falavigna
** Tags added: uus-pre-ff-810 -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-16 Thread Iain Lane
No, it's not new. From [0]: Update the bug report description and make sure it contains the following information: [...] Detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug. These should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected package to reproduce the bug and verify that the

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-15 Thread Murray Cumming
What should these test cases look like? Why aren't the bug reports (mentioned in the NEWS file) good enough? Is this part of the new SRU policy? -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-09 Thread Iain Lane
Here's the SRU upload, which b/i/r fine. Still needs test cases though. I'm going away for a few days and don't know whether I'll be able to do them before then - it would still be great if someone else could. ** Attachment added: .diff.gz for hardy-proposed

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-05 Thread Iain Lane
** Changed in: glom (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Iain Lane (laney) Status: New = In Progress -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-05 Thread Iain Lane
I shall try to get the SRU upload done in the next couple of days. In the meantime, if anyone has any time to write testcases for the bugs fixed that would speed the process along. -- Please update glom to 1.6.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243163 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-08-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package glom - 1.6.17-0ubuntu1 --- glom (1.6.17-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * New upstream release (LP: #243163, #244712) * debian/glom.sgml: Update with current parameters. -- Iain Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:25:19 +0100 **

[Bug 243163] Re: Please update glom to 1.6.17

2008-07-31 Thread Iain Lane
.diff.gz for intrepid. I don't know what the deal is with the Hardy task, will ask somebody in motu-sru for advice on it at some point soon. ** Summary changed: - Please update glom to 1.7.1 + Please update glom to 1.6.17 ** Changed in: glom (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: Iain Lane (laney) =