Updated patch.
Since Intrepid's mythtv will likely be backported to Hardy, this updated
patch does not use the status_of_proc() function, which is only found in
Intrepid's (and beyond) LSB.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: mythtv.251325.debdiff
This bug was fixed in the package mythtv - 0.21.0+fixes18207-0ubuntu6
---
mythtv (0.21.0+fixes18207-0ubuntu6) intrepid; urgency=low
* debian/mythtv-backend.init: Add the 'status' action (LP: #251325).
-- Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:16:21
-0500
**
Mario Limonciello wrote:
Is lsb-base of this version present in earlier Ubuntu releases
(gutsy,hardy)? MythTV is one of those packages that is very commonly
backported alot. I'd hate to lose backportability if it's not. Otherwise,
looks good
Weren't we going to use Upstart?
--
** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
mythtv-backend init script lacks the 'status' action
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251325
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
mythtv-backend init script lacks the 'status' action
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251325
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: New = In Progress
--
mythtv-backend init script lacks the 'status' action
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251325
You received this bug notification because
Patch attached.
Please review/sponsor/upload.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: mythtv.251325.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16273272/mythtv.251325.debdiff
--
mythtv-backend init script lacks the 'status' action
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251325
You received this bug notification
Is lsb-base of this version present in earlier Ubuntu releases
(gutsy,hardy)? MythTV is one of those packages that is very commonly
backported alot. I'd hate to lose backportability if it's not. Otherwise,
looks good
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 18:51, Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
