Thanks Patrick. This isn't really considered out-of-date by our
standards, since packages aren't typically updated starting from a
couple months BEFORE the new version of Ubuntu is released (ie Hardy
packages were updated to the most recent version roughly 6 months ago,
so if THEY themselves
Actually, I was hoping for it to be put into backports. I'm not very
familiar with the versioning system for Ubuntu, but I am familiar enough
that the first thing I did to check for the new version was look
hardy-backports and, as a last resort, Intrepid.
I would consider 1.8.2 to be a
Oh, for reference I've attached the init scripts I'm talking about.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Patrick C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, I was hoping for it to be put into backports. I'm not very
familiar with the versioning system for Ubuntu, but I am familiar enough
that the first
Thanks Patrick, you have some good ideas. I will confirm this and see
what the process is for requesting a backport is. As for the
scripts/sudo, that probably deserves a separate bug report, I think it
will get proper attention that way.
By the way, there is no need to copy all the quotes in your
