[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2013-06-03 Thread Renato
I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 and no Link/Unlink options too. Should a new bug report be created? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 Title: Support contact grouping (metacontacts) To

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2013-06-03 Thread Renato
Oh, this worked: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687856 Incredibly awkward. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #687856 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687856 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2013-02-02 Thread Timo Reimerdes
So it WAS there, and I'm NOT crazy. I have the exact same issue as Rodolfo Gonella Diaza: I can't group the contacts anymore. Since some of my best friends have up to seven different accounts linked to various of my own accounts... well, basically the display isn't enough to tell who is online and

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2012-09-06 Thread Rodolfo Gonella Diaza
Hi To all! I have to resume this thread... I'm on Ubuntu 12.04 and I have no group contacts option in the context menu of contacts in the contact list... It used to be there since months ago... but one day just disappeared! I have written today the following question and I've been suggested to do

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2011-01-01 Thread Martin Schröder
Now grouping of contacts works, that's right. But if a contact chooses to switch the protocol (which many of my friends with multiprotocol clients do randomly), another chat window opens. The behavior I expect is like in pidgin: merged contacts share a single chat window. -- You received this

Re: [Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2011-01-01 Thread frederik.nnaji
file a seperate bug. 2011/1/1 Martin Schröder 256...@bugs.launchpad.net Now grouping of contacts works, that's right. But if a contact chooses to switch the protocol (which many of my friends with multiprotocol clients do randomly), another chat window opens. The behavior I expect is like in

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: empathy Importance: Unknown = Medium -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-09-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package empathy - 2.31.91.1-0ubuntu1 --- empathy (2.31.91.1-0ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low * New upstream release * debian/control: - add libgcr-dev build-dep * debian/patches/91_git_unref_empathyindividualview_later.patch: - additional fix

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-08-31 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: empathy Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-08-31 Thread Omer Akram
this bug will be fixed after Maverick beta is released as empathy 2.31.91 will then be uploaded ** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: people-core Status: New = Invalid -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-08-29 Thread Felix Zweig
The upstream bug report (gnome-bugs #460647) lists this issue as fixed: Thanks to the hard work of Travis and Philip, Empathy master is now able to link contacts together and meta-contacts are displayed in the contact list. I think it's finally time to close this bug \o/ The change will come

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-08-07 Thread Lee Braiden
Just one additional thought: this should support priorities, on a general and per-contact basis. For example, given a contact with both jabber and MSN, a FOSS user may prefer to contact someone through Jabber as a general rule. But a particular user may use jabber in work, and MSN on his phone,

Re: [Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-18 Thread Valeryan_24
Hello, That's right for libfolks, here is the mail received on the bugzilla list for this point. And as others I hope for this feature which is essential today with multiplication of networks (Facebook, Jabber, MSN...). Best regards. Original Message Subject:[Bug

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-17 Thread Kai Mast
It seems like the plan is now to use libfolks. Look here: http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/Folks -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-16 Thread Asaf Zamir
Is it a fair guess that the logs would be merged between the contacts or would it be by ID (so j...@msn won't be the same log as j...@icq)? How is it on Pidgin? Log merging or not? -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-16 Thread frederik.nnaji
i suggest to think in persons, not protocols that comes to one more naturally. On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 17:04, Asaf Zamir asaf.za...@gmail.com wrote: Is it a fair guess that the logs would be merged between the contacts or would it be by ID (so j...@msn won't be the same log as j...@icq)? How

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-16 Thread Jonatan Schroeder
Is it a fair guess that the logs would be merged between the contacts or would it be by ID (so j...@msn won't be the same log as j...@icq)? How is it on Pidgin? Log merging or not? Pidgin saves each log separately, but shows them together. This way, j...@msn and j...@icq are stored separately

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-13 Thread Danny Piccirillo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: empathy Empathy does not support grouping contacts, ie. specifying a friend which exists in several IM networks. This results in same friend being showed over and over again in the list(s). - The problem is planned to be fixed using

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-12 Thread Serge Matveenko
Jamin, Pidgin supports indicator-applet. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-11 Thread Felix Zweig
Thank you all for showing support of this bug. However, those me too comments are of no use and just create noise. Thus, would you be so kind and refrain from adding those? Selecting This bug affects me too is adequate. Thank you! -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-11 Thread Jamin W. Collins
Considering the bug has been open for just short of two years, and has at best a Wishlist state. The upstream report for this is nearly three years old. Yet somehow this has still been selected as the default client for Ubuntu. As others have pointed out this is a fairly standard feature of

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-11 Thread Brian Curtis
@Jamin, no, the noise is truly unnecessary. If you don't like it then don't use it. If you are a mee too then click this bug affects me too you are not forced to use empathy as uninstalling it and using another IM client is well within the simplicities of Ubuntu. Thats what makes it such a

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-11 Thread Jamin W. Collins
Not quite, see the Indicator applet is forced upon those of use that want a volume icon regardless of whether we want the mail icon or it's other bits. As such it's either use the default or have forced bloat in terms of the systray/notification area. If there's a way to do away with the

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-10 Thread Omen_20
I'd love to use Empathy for its integration, but all my friends have multiple accounts. I have to use this. Can you imagine having 4 versions of everyone? -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-08 Thread Shimi Chen
Definitely the killer feature keeping me from using Empathy. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-05-03 Thread Ian Gustafson
+1 Empathy is getting closer, but without this feature it won't hold a candle to Pidgin's usability. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-04-30 Thread Tom Verdaat
Nice quote by Paul Kishimoto on the related bug on GNOME bugzilla: So the following have all been mentioned: People (0.0.6 release two years old, https://launchpad.net/people-core)

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-04-30 Thread Jerry
What Tom and Phil said... A little more than a year ago Ubuntu made the bold choice of replacing Pidgin, which I'll concede, is a stagnant and no-longer innovating project, but that is nevertheless pretty much up there feature AND stability-wise (except for video and some other extras that it's

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-04-30 Thread Frank Abel
Just look at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9199695 to get an idea of the amount of people that need this bug fixed. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-04-30 Thread Danjones
Why is this so far back on the Roadmap? This is a serious problem with Empathy. With it being the official IM client in Gnome and Ubuntu, it needs to behave like people expect multi-protocol IM clients to behave, and contact grouping is a feature that pretty much every other similar program does.

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Moorhouse
The empathy roadmap lists this feature as planned for Gnome 3.0... there really should be a stopgap solution even if it's not the ideal one in the meantime as it seems bizarre to support multiple protocols and not have this ability. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2010-03-21 Thread Kai Mast
Is there any progress update? I think this bug really needs to be fixed to make empathy a state of the art messenger. Just imagine. I sometimes have 4 buddies that are the same person. That means my contact list at the moment ist completely clustered with the same names over and over... --

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-12-06 Thread Danny Piccirillo
** Description changed: Binary package hint: empathy Empathy does not support grouping contacts, ie. specifying a friend which exists in several IM networks. This results in same friend being - showed over and over again in the list(s). The problem is planned to be - fixed using People

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-11-01 Thread jeremy-list
This is the only reason I'm still using pidgin at all. I'm happy to do some work to implement this. I'd prefer to do so using the people- project unless someone really wants me to use soylent. -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-11-01 Thread Danny Piccirillo
What are the differenced between the two projects? You should probably post to upstream Empathy if you want to help out. Thanks for picking up on this-- tons of us users are dying for it =) -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-08-30 Thread Danny Piccirillo
The roadmap (http://live.gnome.org/Empathy/Roadmap) says that People (https://edge.launchpad.net/people-project) or Soylent (http://live.gnome.org/Soylent) will be used. Can we discuss the differences and start working on that? ** Description changed: Binary package hint: empathy Empathy

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-08-30 Thread Danny Piccirillo
** Also affects: people-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 256478] Re: Support contact grouping (metacontacts)

2009-05-31 Thread Robert Ancell
** Summary changed: - Multi-protocol contacts not supported + Support contact grouping (metacontacts) -- Support contact grouping (metacontacts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --