** Changed in: netatalk (Debian)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
Title:
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
To
@Darik: What do you mean by that? I can't find any reference to
**GnuTLS** on the debian bug page. Also a Google search didn't reveal
anything.
I think the encrypted authentication now works with lucid. My
/etc/netatalk/afpd.conf contains at the end the uncommented line:
- -transall -uamlist
What I can't understand is why you couldn't give the package compiled but any
user can compil it at home ?
Really need a workaround !
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Er, hasn't this been fixed in lucid? ISTR just installing netatalk and
it worked out of the box with my macs, which was all I ever wanted...
I'd presumed someone got over themselves and let it in. :-)
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You
It looks like somebody wrote the gnutls replacement for netatalk. Also,
from the changelog:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565969
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #565969
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565969
--
netatalk not built with encrypted
... however, dhx2 doesn't work with Mac OS 9 clients. 'cleartext' auth
doesn't support password lengths 8 chars, so if you have a users with
longer passwords they'll be locked out.
Those of us unfortunate enough to be supporting such dinosaurs can get
NetATalk to build against OpenSSL quite
Since Netatalk 2.0.4 encrypted auth is available with the authentication
module DHX2 which uses libgcrypt.
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct
Still broken in Karmic.
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The netatalk distributed with jaunty is still broken. It looks as if the
configure script hasn't been updated to know about the GNUTLS_DHX
#define used to select GNU libraries instead of OpenSSL.
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received
In order to let netatalk work with my Leopard system, I had to rebuild
the package following this guide.
http://www.kremalicious.com/2008/06/ubuntu-as-mac-file-server-and-time-
machine-volume/
It's so bad Ubuntu can't find a way to promote file sharing with such a
huge number of machines running
I followed the link above to the Debian bug, then scrolled to the end
and followed the links to a discussion at Sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1035455group_id=8642atid=358642
someone used a compatible library that can be included in the 2.0.4
version of
With the increasing deployment of MacOS Leopard this issue is rapidly
becoming critical since Leopard insists on using encryption.
It is made worse by licence issues in debuild preventing local rebuild
from source.
Leopard also requires a suitable entry in /etc/avahi/services. While it is easy
I wholeheartedly agree with Keith Matthews here. This problem makes
interoperability with Mac OS X systems much more difficult for users.
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
excuse me if this is a silly question, but why is it ok for openssh-
client/openssh-server and apache2.2-common to depend on libssl and not
netatalk?
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi,
thanks for the reply. I spent some time scratching my head over this
and delving into the weird world of incompatible free software
licenses. It seems strange that we have here a piece of free
software, which relies on another piece of free software; we can
distribute both of them,
No, as netatalk linked with openssl wouldn't be redistributable, which
is a main requirement for inclusion in multiverse.
One option is to convince netatalk upstream to add a openssl exception to the
license.
An other option is to try if netatalk builds and works with gnutls.
--
netatalk not
** Changed in: netatalk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Wishlist
Status: New = Confirmed
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Can netatalk be moved to Multiverse, or another version of it with SSL
be put in Multiverse? Here's my logic - the reason you would want
Netatalk is primarily to run a file server in a heterogeneous network
environment with Mac clients. But, Macs of any recent vintage won't
connect to an AFP
This one is immensely annoying. I had the same journey as n8gray...
Anyway, I'll try to refrain from whining.
Is this one moving at all? didier said he would commit the boilerplate,
has anything happened since then?
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
** Changed in: netatalk (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I agree that it should be made better visible to the end user that the
debian/ubuntu versions of netatalk don't support encrypted auth. Most
people use this authentication type so spending hours trying to diagnose
such problems is really a hassle. Until it gets fixed I suggest to do
something
Where is DES in gnutls?
Anyway I will commit the boilerplate: you can link netatalk with openSSL
tada, tada..
--
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct
This one is ugly, looks like netatalk is practically unusable for file-
sharing until this gets fixed. Looks like the only reasonable way around
it is to rewrite about 6 or 7 different chunks of encryption code ~ 20
lines each, to use gnutls + gnucrypt instead of openssl, and I just
don't have the
23 matches
Mail list logo
