[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2014-04-20 Thread halfbeing
I agree with Mikkel. I use 13.10 and I find every day that my machine becomes completely unusable for around 15 minutes or so because of updatedb. This is not behaviour I used to get when I was using Windows, and I have never heard a Mac user complain about anything like this. -- You received

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2014-02-12 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
locate/updatedb/findutils is *destroying* my laptop on a daily basis. Recent Ubuntu releases (in particular after 12.04) seem to have gotten particularly suceptible to UI hangs under heavy IO load. This makes Unity (and all other desktop systems I've tried) unusable for ~20 minutes each day. --

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2011-10-09 Thread trans
Why hasn't this been done? This is the one issue that has me wanting to throw Ubuntu out the window. Every morning at 8am it eats my hard drive for breakfast for more than 10 minutes straight. And for what? I've tried using ubnutu's search feature and it never finds any thing. So what the f is it

Re: [Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2011-10-09 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
Are you referring to a graphical search feature (which should have its own indexing process) or the locate command? You can change the configuration on your own system until a decision is made on this issue. Maco On Oct 9, 2011 8:01 AM, trans 271...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Why hasn't this

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2010-01-15 Thread Cruncher
The optimal solution of course would be an incremental database update - only change stuff that actually *does* change, and don't rescan all filesystems of which 99% are unchanged between updates. But what's missing there is a decent idea on how to make sure all filesystem changes are

Re: [Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2009-09-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:19:15AM -, Kevin Hunter wrote: One issue for me is the fact that I use my laptop's battery a LOT. The cron job for this isn't currently smart enough to realize that I'm on a battery and not run that job. I thought we fixed that a while back - can you attach your

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2009-09-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Huh. Sho' nuff. I have a similar fragment: if which on_ac_power /dev/null 21; then AC_POWER=0 on_ac_power /dev/null 21 || AC_POWER=$? if [ $AC_POWER -eq 1 ]; then echo 2 On battery power, not running today. exit 1 fi fi At first glance and trial, the logic

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2009-09-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
One issue for me is the fact that I use my laptop's battery a LOT. The cron job for this isn't currently smart enough to realize that I'm on a battery and not run that job. Reducing to once a week would help my particular situation, as it takes about 15-20 minutes of continuous spinning to

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2009-08-20 Thread Martin von Wittich
I think this should remain a daily cron job. If you can't trust locate to be at least halfway up-to-date you could just use find instead, or you'd be always forced to run updatedb before using locate. This would mitigate locate's benefits. OTOH I don't believe that reducing reads in any way would

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
Marking this confirmed because weekly would be easier on hard drives, and it is currently daily. ** Changed in: mlocate (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- updatedb should be weekly, not daily https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271272 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
A further optimization might be to separate updates into dev sections. Clearly, not everyone separates their data from their system, but for those who do, being able to scan just the /home dir would also reduce the wear-and-tear further. Then, though it makes the mlocate script a little more

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
An apt-file tie-in could make it not have to even do index updating for apt. If there's some way to get data from apt-file to the index, that is. -- updatedb should be weekly, not daily https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Point. On the other hand, I'm suggesting a small incremental improvement. In order of difficulty: 1. Move mlocate to /etc/cron.weekly/. (Very easy.) 2. Only update system dirs (i.e. /) if dpkg has been run. (Easy.) 3. Split updates of / and /home. (Hard.) 4. Update system dirs when dpkg is

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
Tracker's in charge of home directories anyway, right? So no real need for having both locate *and* tracker index them. Ignore for the moment that I disable tracker due to knowing where my files are. -- updatedb should be weekly, not daily https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271272 You received

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Heh. Right there with you. Tracker takes too many resources for me, even on this dual core 2.2 Ghz with 4GB ram, so I too have disabled it. But, for the vast majority of folks who won't disable it -- or when tracker graduates to less of a resource hog and a more mature product overall -- that's

[Bug 271272] Re: updatedb should be weekly, not daily

2008-09-17 Thread James Westby
** Changed in: mlocate (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: anacron = mlocate -- updatedb should be weekly, not daily https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list