Copied to intrepid-updates.
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
intrepid-proposed package copied to jaunty.
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
[Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
I verified that suspend/resume still works normally (without uswsusp, as
installed by default) with this version.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
[Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287374
You rec
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:51 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Accepted into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here.
> Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
> documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
>
> ** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu In
Accepted into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here.
Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: veri
Here's an updated debdiff which includes this bug number.
--
Chow Loong Jin
** Attachment added: "pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu8.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18824908/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu8.debdiff
--
[Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp
https://bugs.launchp
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:27 +, hyperair wrote:
> While we know that s2ram isn't going to be available by default, I think
> we shouldn't break it for those who do have s2ram, or it would be a
> regression for them. As of now this patch doesn't carry any negative
> effects to either party, i.e.
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:12 +, James Westby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think your patch is a sensible one. If we know s2ram isn't going
> to be available we shouldn't bother checking for it.
>
> I haven't reviewed the patch in detail yet, but I think it may be a
> little too late for the release. I d
Hi,
I think your patch is a sensible one. If we know s2ram isn't going
to be available we shouldn't bother checking for it.
I haven't reviewed the patch in detail yet, but I think it may be a
little too late for the release. I do however think it makes a reasonable
candidate for an SRU.
I'm subs
** Attachment added: "pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu8.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18790980/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu8.debdiff
--
[Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287374
You received this bug notification because you are a member
10 matches
Mail list logo
