** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/synergy
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #520008
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520008
** Changed in: synergy (Debian)
Status: New = Unknown
** Changed in: synergy (Debian)
Bugwatch: Debian Bug tracker #504654 = Debian Bug tracker #520008
--
synergyc dies with
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Andreas Wenning (andreas-wenning)
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: synergy (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Also affects: synergy (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Andreas Wenning (andreas-wenning)
Status: In Progress
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug was fixed in the package synergy - 1.3.1-5ubuntu2
---
synergy (1.3.1-5ubuntu2) jaunty; urgency=low
* Call to XInitThreads() needed; prevents frequent crashes. (LP: #299152)
- Patch taken from debian; applied inline.
-
** Changed in: synergy (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks a lot Anton Aaron, this patch works perfectly for me - no more
synergyc seg faults.
Damien.
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Looking at the attachments in this bug report, I noticed that
synergy_XInitThreads.patch was not flagged as a patch. A patch
contains changes to an Ubuntu package that will resolve a bug and this
attachment is one! Subsequently, I've checked the patch flag for it.
In the future when submitting
Thanks for the patch Anton. I was experiencing failures on the order of every 5
minutes,
and I haven't had a crash yet after applying it.
I've created PPA builds of synergy with the patch applied for anyone
else suffering from this.
https://launchpad.net/~a.kurtz/+archive
--
synergyc dies
I've been hitting this bug regularly and I agree its pretty annoying.
The synergy X11 backend claims to only make Xlib calls from the main
thread:
// NOTE -- the X display is shared among several objects but is owned
// by the CXWindowsScreen. Xlib is not reentrant so we must ensure
// that no
It seems Debian is also plagued by this bug (not that surprising but):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504654
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I modified the code around the assert to say:
/* if Xlib has a partial request pending then XCB doesn't know about
* the current request yet */
if(dpy-xcb-partial_request) {
++xcb_req;
printf (partial request thing\n);
}
if (XCB_SEQUENCE_COMPARE(xcb_req, ,
The upstream bug report is about the same assert being hit in the
synergy server (I'm linking it even though both me and aaron is hitting
the assert in the synergy client).
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2037563
http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2037563
** Also
I'm also seeing this all the time. Happens about every hour or so. This
is probably the most annoying bug I have in intrepid right now. At least
I've been able to get a full stack leading up to this particular assert:
#1 0xb7e04a25 in _XGetXCBBuffer (dpy=0x8ec27b0) at ../../src/xcb_lock.c:101
#2
The actual assert (in package libx11-xcb1) contains a macro, so in the code is
looks like this:
assert(XCB_SEQUENCE_COMPARE(xcb_req, =, dpy-request));
I don't know enough about XCB to figure out what to make of that.
--
synergyc dies with xcb_lock.c assertion failed
16 matches
Mail list logo
