I prune the kernel modules out of the readahead lists before I generate
them, sometimes I admittedly get it wrong, but this is generally human
error not a bug
** Changed in: readahead (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
readahead default configuration hurts the system performance
Hello Scott,
Thanks for the explanation.
Why is ubuntu not using preload ?
FYI,
I replaced readahead by preload on the below system
and it made it faster:
- CPU: AMD Athlon XP 1500+
- mem: 392 MB
- Ubuntu version: hardy
- minimum total size of the used files of the tracked processes: 4MB
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 16:15 +, Jérôme wrote:
Why is ubuntu not using preload ?
preload, readahead, prefetch, sreadahead, etc. are all just variations
on a theme.
We currently use readahead, and don't have compelling reasons to switch
to the others - since they introduce just as many
** Changed in: readahead (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None = readahead
--
readahead default configuration hurts the system performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
