*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 344878 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344878
Could someone change the title of this report to mention eCryptfs rather
than LVM?
--
LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359531
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 344878 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344878
@bitinerant
This bug is a duplicate so the name really doesn't matter, but just so you know
you can change the title of the bug yourself by clicking the yellow button next
to the title.
--
LVM file name
Yes, I had two filenames rejected for length when i copied across data
from my old hdd. However, I thought two was pretty acceptable, so I
just renamed them.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:02:08PM -, Gabe Gorelick wrote:
Is this still an issue on Karmic or Lucid Beta?
--
LVM file name
Sorry, I was mistaken, I'm not using LVM, I'm using the encrypted home
directory (ecryptfs). Is it the same issue?
--
LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Package changed: ubuntu = ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 344878 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344878
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 344878
file name to long when creating new file (ecryptfs_lookup: lookup_one_len()
returned [-36] on lower_dentry)
--
LVM file name maximum length is
Is this still an issue on Karmic or Lucid Beta?
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Incomplete
--
LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hi, I was using this link: http://ftp.freepark.org/pub/CDROM-
Images/ubuntu/jaunty/ubuntu-9.04-beta-alternate-i386.iso
And the exact time of the downloaded file were: 2009-03-24 07:57. (This
is not the time, when I downloaded it, it happened last week.)
--
LVM file name maximum length is
I was studying how LVM works and by now I know this is only a logical
system. Upon it the alternate install process made me a fine ext3. The
beginning of dr -T is:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/noname-root
ext3
I measured: file name
I made a brother bug of this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/360219
--
LVM file name maximum length is shorter than in ext3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359531
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Hi, thanks for the follow-up. So your tests suggest that ext3 long-
filename support is broken in Ubuntu 9.04, while the use of encrypted
LVM may or may not be influencing the problem.
As 9.04 is still under development, can you add what date your install
disc was from, and whether you tried to
Hi, you're right that ext3 has a limited filename size at 255 bytes - it
depends on what character encoding you use how many characters that
implies, but at most 255. In your example with only underscores and
numbers I think you should be able to fit 255. It works for me.
LVM is not a file
12 matches
Mail list logo
