[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2010-02-03 Thread Jeff Strunk
** Changed in: sleepd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-06-13 Thread MichalR
Package from your PPA fixed the issue for me. Thanks for the uber quick response and fix. -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-12 Thread Jeff Strunk
There is a fixed package in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~jstrunk-math/+archive/testing I have also attached the patch ** Attachment added: ignore interrups = MAX_IRQS http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26639441/sleepd.diff -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-12 Thread Jeff Strunk
Working on a fix. ** Changed in: sleepd (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: sleepd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jeff Strunk (jstrunk-math) -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-11 Thread Jeff Strunk
I think this might be apm related. strace looks like it can't find some apm files. apm_available returns code 1. When I modprobe apm, I see the following in dmesg: [399389.775014] apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.16ac) [399389.775017] apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-11 Thread Jeff Strunk
My previous comment was incorrect. The problem is that /proc/interrupts has changed formatting. In hardy, there was always 1 CPU0 column whether the system had a single core CPU or a dual core CPU. In Jaunty, a dual core system gets two CPU columns. I have verified that a single core system does

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-11 Thread Jeff Strunk
sscanf was not causing the segfault. The additional columns creates a different less obvious bug. The real problem in this bug is that there are now IRQs greater than 2299, but MAX_IRQS in sleepd.h is 255. I have verified that increasing this value stops this segfault. This brings up the

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-03 Thread Michal
** Attachment added: strace.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26296123/strace.log -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-03 Thread Michal
** Attachment added: ltrace.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26296150/ltrace.log -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-03 Thread Michal
** Attachment added: lshw.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26296185/lshw.log -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371463] Re: Segmentation fault on start

2009-05-03 Thread Michal
Please let me know if you need any further info. I really would like to be able to use sleepd :-) -- Segmentation fault on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs