prboom is a community supported (universe) package which doesn't receive
the same level of support as those officially supported (main) under
LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
Lucid is supposed to be LTS release and still supported for a couple of
years. It's a bit puzzling that lucid repositories still contain such a
version that doesn't even start. The above fix from 2010 works but why
it isn't simply included in the lucid repositories?
--
You received this bug
Not fixed - installed 2:2.5.0+dfsg1 from Lucid repository :
application still fails :
uname -a
Linux laptop 2.6.32-26-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 09:00:03 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
prboom
prboom v2.5.0 (http://prboom.sourceforge.net/)
I_SetAffinityMask: manual affinity mask is 1
Tony, that's because that isn't the fixed package. As the last message
said, the fixed package is 2:2.5.0+dfsg1-5ubuntu1, which is currently in
maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package prboom - 2:2.5.0+dfsg1-5ubuntu1
---
prboom (2:2.5.0+dfsg1-5ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
* debian/rules: Add --disable-i386-asm to avoid crash on i386 (LP: #375498)
-- Emmet Hikory per...@ubuntu.com Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:15:00 +0900
** Changed
Just tried Freedom on Maverick Meerkat using prdoom (installed from
synaptic package manager). Will try the other package.
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Other mentioned .deb apackage works, only screen stays rather small. Any
suggestions?
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
fixed the game window width by starting prboom -width 1200 -height 800.
Update-manager mentioned there was an update for prboom. As I expect
that to be the faulty version I will not update prboom for now. Not
until there is more news here anyways.
--
prboom exits with signal 8
Still actual for Lucid. After starting new game prboom crashes. Version
from debian sid repos works fine.
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Also, on 64-bit Ubuntu prboom also works correctly. This bug affects
only x86-version package.
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Confirming bug, discovered on Karmic and still present on Lucid.
Using the package from sid solves the problem for me too.
Can this bug please be assigned to someone who can solve it.
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because
I bumped into this again when updating my system and having ditched my
locally compiled version in the process. Is this fix still waiting in
some queue or something? I guess all we need is ---disable-i386-asm for
configure in debian/rules.
Further, I built a version with symbols and tracked it to
** Summary changed:
- prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
+ prboom exits with signal 8
--
prboom exits with signal 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: prboom (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: prboom (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Robert J Lee, thanks for your offer. For info, in general, if you define
the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable to include nostrip, then
the package build process will not strip debugging symbols from
binaries.
However, I passed this onto the upstream author, who suggested that
there was no
Greg,
Did you read the bug report? We already know that.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I grabbed the deb from:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/prboom
and it did solve the problem.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thanks. Unfortunately we need a backtrace with debugging symbols which
means one from a rebuilt package (there is no seperate debugging symbols
package for prboom at the moment)
I've passed this onto upstream who suggest just disabling all asm. I
don't kNow who is responsible for the ubuntu
@Jon: I would be happy to rebuild the package and provide a backtrace.
But I'm not sure which options I need to specify to enable the
appropriate debugging symbols; can you advise?
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification
I am experiencing this bug. I have attached a backtrace.
** Attachment added: backtrace
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35545683/gdb-prboom.txt
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Could someone who is experiencing this bug please provide a backtrace?
It looks like some of the assembler in prboom is not liked by the
version of gcc being used by Ubuntu. I'm guessing this is a more recent
version than Debian (or some feature or patch applied is missing on
Debian) so the
Thanks to ferrazrafael for your efforts in providing a fixed package,
but I don't think it's a good idea to advise people to install unsigned
packages.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
yeah jon, use debian package is more secure, less chance that anyone put
a malicious code in there.
I will take a look in the back trace, if I can find something I will post here..
thanks
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug
my build with the --disable-i386-asm option is here for download, so we
could play while the bug isnt fixed
http://www.zumodrive.com/share/1WBuZTc3Mj
** Changed in: prboom (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
Thanks. :)
I took the debian package until now. works also.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/prboom
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm that running apt-source prboom, editing debian/rules to
add --disable-i386-asm to the ./configure line and running dpkg-
buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -b created a new deb file that seems quite
playable to me.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
Narrowed down: If I recompile the source .deb from Karmic with -O1 it
works. When I turn -O2 back on it crashes.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Configuring with --disable-i386-asm seems to make it work, too.
--
prboom exits with signal 8 on karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375498
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Ok I can confirm this using karmic's prboom package on a Debian sid i386
machine. Using the latest version of the package in Debian (-5 rather
than -4) is fine.
I suspect a bad build or something.
Someone who looks after this stuff in Ubuntu should either schedule a
rebuild or pull in the more
I think this bug has nothing to do with sound problems in previous
versions. Here's my commandline output:
$ prboom -nosound -noaccel
prboom v2.5.0 (http://prboom.sourceforge.net/)
I_SetAffinityMask: manual affinity mask is 1
M_LoadDefaults: Load system defaults.
default file:
30 matches
Mail list logo
