** Changed in: udisks (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) => (unassigned)
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
** Package changed: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu) => udisks (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: udisks (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => Low
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
This was a pretty short-sighted decision. I have a bunch of scripts
that depend on the drive being mounted as /media/disk. If I try the
work-around and label it as "disk", it gets mounted on "/media/DISK"
since fat32 isn't honoring the lower-case disk label. S I'm left
with a bunch of broken
I cant seem to label it on my android phone. However, either way, it should
be consistent with what nautilus is calling it. 169gb drive makes more sense
for an unlabled drive than the uuid.
Sent From My Awesome Mobile
On 15 Nov 2009 10:50, "Martijn Kaandorp"
wrote:
System -> Administration -> D
System -> Administration -> Disk Utility (Palimpsest) -> change label
No need to unmount first, just remount (unmount and mount) after changing the
label in order
to see the mountpoint at your newly given label /media/label.
This works great and i hope that canonical will keep this in future rele
I think the behaviour of using uuid is correct when a disk does not have a
label.
Just supply a label for your disk and use that in your scripts.
This is user manageable. I think this is the way to go.
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
Y
Now add a label to the drive and remount it and the label is used in
/media/your-disk-label.
To label in Karmic 9.10 release, go to "System -> Administration -> Disk
Utility" in Karmic release
Select the drive and then partition, there will be a label field text box you
can use their.
Unmount
My previous comment seems to be addressed in bug #423058
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
My previous comment seems to be addressed in bug #423058
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Martijn Vermaat [2009-09-16 12:54 -]:
> This functionality is related to this bug. Is it still possible to
> change the location devicekit-disks will mount a specific disk on? The
> UI of the gnome-mount functionality is no longer there.
You can change the label in System -> Admin -> Drive Man
Before devicekit-disks (so up to and including Jaunty) it was possible
to change the mount location by right-clicking on the drive icon. I
think this was functionality of gnome-mount which is now gone.
This functionality is related to this bug. Is it still possible to
change the location devicekit
I didn't actually confuse it with the nautilus renaming wishlist bug, I
just set it to wishlist because it's not a bug in the sense of
"unintended behaviour". The current behaviour is intended.
However, I tend to agree that it's not really desirable in the GUI
sense.
> Who is upsteam in this case
In fact the wishlist to have nautilus provide support for changing volume
labels has already been Wishlisted here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/68924
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug noti
@pitti Martin Pitt - I am glad that "[You] agree that it should be
possible in nautilus."
I hope you did not confuse this bug as a feature request to make disk
labeling part of nautilus. That is not the purpose of this bug (please
review the Wishlist importance if that is what it is based on). I w
** Attachment added: "fat2-uuid-title.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30766090/fat2-uuid-title.png
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: "extfs-uuid-title.png.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30766107/extfs-uuid-title.png.png
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "nautilus-as-root-user_comp.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30766124/nautilus-as-root-user_comp.png
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: "file-roller-as-root-user_comp.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30766121/file-roller-as-root-user_comp.png
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "fat1-uuid-title.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30766082/fat1-uuid-title.png
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
For those of you who say that the underlying naming scheme is hidden, I
would like to expose that it is not well hidden.
Primarily, when opening a disk, the UUID will be the title of the window.
Secondarily, when clicking on the location bar (pencil icon) it exposes the
UUID.
Tertiary, when run
Comment 13 & 14 from Bernhard exposes the thought process that most
users go though when trying to relabel. Using gparted or palimpsest to
re-label an unmounted disk may not work, since the user may be missing
packages like ntfsprogs jfsutils reiserfsprogs xfsprogs, since they are
not shipped with
Bernhard - we prefer not to have release names in bug titles. If this
bug is still open when Karmic is released, then Karmic+1 will
automatically have the same issue. This means it is not karmic-specific
then, and makes it incredibly confusing and much more work to hand edit
all the bugs with relea
Ah, just saw that you need "reiserfstune" for that. It's a bit tricky
for a beginner though.
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I have a reiserfs partition that I cannot label by any means, neither
palimpsest, nor gparted, being sudo or not. Fat partitions can be re-
labeled though.
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390304
You received this bug notification because you a
Do you mean palimpsest? I am not able to change the label for my USB
drive there.
Btw, Martin: since the bug is karmic-specific, it's not so out of line
to put "karmic" into the title. It's your call though. :)
--
unlabeled partitions are mounted under their UUIDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
25 matches
Mail list logo