$ change-override.py -c main -s karmic -t prelink
2009-10-08 22:09:21 INFOcreating lockfile
2009-10-08 22:09:26 INFOOverride Component to: 'main'
2009-10-08 22:09:26 INFO'prelink - 0.0.20090311-1ubuntu3/universe/admin'
source overridden
Confirm this transaction? [yes, no] yes
$ change-override.py -c main -s karmic -S libelf
2009-10-08 22:08:44 INFOcreating lockfile
2009-10-08 22:08:49 INFOOverride Component to: 'main'
2009-10-08 22:08:49 INFO'libelf - 0.8.12-0ubuntu1/universe/libs' source
overridden
2009-10-08 22:08:49 INFO
please don't promote libelf before it's not updated to 0.8.12. (see bug
#438620 for a FFe, or tell me it's a bug fix release to upload without
FFe ;)
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Post-beta, it will likely be used in the fglrx and nvidia packages. The
libelf 0.8.12 upload is waiting for post-beta as well.
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Please note that this will not be promoted unless something in main or
the seeds require it. Please make this a (build)-dependency of
something, otherwise we will just time out and close this MIR.
Thank you!
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug
Please note that this will not be promoted unless something in main or
the seeds require it. Please make this a (build)-dependency of
something, otherwise we will just time out and close this MIR.
Thank you!
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug
On the .pot: the issue is that we usually update the .pot /during build/
to make sure it contains the latest strings (might be out of date in the
upstream release or new strings might be added in Ubuntu patches). So I
was asking whether it's useful or not to bother to update the .pot
during
Approved
** Changed in: prelink (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: prelink (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Loïc Minier (lool) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: libelf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Loïc Minier (lool) = (unassigned)
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I should add, this is to solve the Executable Stack problems seen with
fglrx-installer and nvidia-* as detailed here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap/ExecutableStacks
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRprelink
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRlibelf
** Also affects: libelf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
MIR for prelink
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
So I would approve libelf and prelink if you'd:
- sub to bugmail
- review the source code for the build time warnings I mentionned
- check whether we need to build a .pot for libelf (it bdeps on gettext and
there's a po/ dir, but I'm not sure whether we need to bother)
** Changed in: libelf
Security team should sub to bugmail of prelink and libelf (nobody
subscribed to libelf's).
I wonder whether we should add lpia support to these packages. I mostly
care about number of packages FTBFSing on lpia rather than getting the
new feature on lpia though.
== libelf ==
libelf has a couple
- bug mail now subscribed
- the build-time warnings are negligible: the result of ftruncate is checked
later (via lseek, etc), and the system() use is to call a static string (init
U).
- there is already a generated .pot file in the po/ directory
** Changed in: prelink (Ubuntu)
Status:
14 matches
Mail list logo
