[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2012-04-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Debian) Status: Won't Fix = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 Title: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old To

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2009-09-06 Thread Caracuri
also i have this problem with: Linux notebook 2.6.31-9-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Sun Aug 30 17:39:23 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Ubuntu Karmic Koala -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2009-09-06 Thread Tormod Volden
Yes, this can be different again now that the hwclock setting is done by a udev rule instead of an init script. Caracuri, can you please file a new bug, using ubuntu-bug util-linux? -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-09-05 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Description changed: If the system clock has been misadjusted while fsck last run, fsck reports on next boot that the partition has gone 49710 days without being checked, check forced. Happens to me in Ubuntu after I do an occasional boot to a parallel partition if fsck gets run there.

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-08-30 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: iso-testing -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-08-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Debian) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Debian) Status: Unknown = Confirmed ** Changed in: util-linux (Debian) Status: Unknown = Fix Released -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread kko
Thank you for looking into this. In the latest versions of e2fsprogs, e2fsck will print a messaging that the clock is insane, and then check the filesystem since it could also be the case that the clock is insane. If I understand correctly, this should be sufficient to consider the originally

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread Tormod Volden
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343645 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread Tormod Volden
We have to keep one Ubuntu task open as long as the bug is not fixed in Ubuntu. Note that the Status of the (Ubuntu) tasks reflects the status in Ubuntu and not upstream. You can open (upstream) tasks which can have independent status. If the e2fsprogs issue is fixed upstream, and we just wait

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Well, the problem is fundamentally more about the initscripts and util- linux than it is about e2fsprogs. The message printed by e2fsprogs will change, so that it says the time is in the future, as opposed to 49710 days. But the root cause of the bug really is the fact that the system clock is

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread Tormod Volden
Thanks Theodore, that sounds good. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: sysvinit = util-linux ** Also affects: util-linux (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342887 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- fsck should check against a

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread kko
Thank you again for the clarification. (And yes, you are correct in stating that the time it takes to run a filesystem check is what users will complain about.) I am still unsure whether forcing a filesystem check when the timestamp is in the future is the desired action. As it is not my decision

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-26 Thread Tormod Volden
In Gutsy, hwclock is started at S11, which in Ubuntu is after S10udev and before S20checkroot.sh, so this should be fine now. Please reopen if you can reproduce with Gutsy. WRT to the question of fsck'ing if the timestamp is in the future: Then you know the clock is wrong, and you can not trust

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-25 Thread Theodore Ts'o
The fundamental bug here is in the init scripts. E2fsck assumes that the system time is correct. Unfortunately, if you have the system time set to tick localtime, instead of GMT, the Debian/Ubuntu boot scripts do not adjust for the fact that the hardware clock is not ticking UTC until after

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-25 Thread Theodore Ts'o
I started looking further on this issue, and it looks like it has been fixed in util-linux by making /etc/localtime a file, and by making sure the timezone is set correctly at boot time. See these debian bug reports: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343645

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-06-01 Thread Pascal Vandeputte
Update: when you boot Debian Etch for the first time, after installing it into /dev/sda3 on a system with Windows in /dev/sda1, you also get this fsck error. I've installed Etch numerous times on other (Linux- only) systems without any issues whatsoever. -- fsck should check against a timestamp

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-28 Thread Martijn van Iersel
This happened to me too, during the installation of ubuntu 7.04 final. On the first reboot after installation, fsck checked all my partitions (quite annoying in itself). Fsck reported Superblock last mount time is in the future on all partitions, and on /dev/sda9 I got the has gone 49710 days

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-21 Thread Pascal Vandeputte
Same here, same message and amount of days (it's /dev/sda6 in my case because that's where my root partition is). I'm dual-booting with XP and Vista but hadn't booted these since wiping Ubuntu 6.10. -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-18 Thread Olli Rajala
Same here. GMT+2 time zone and Kubuntu 7.04 daily build 20070417. In my case it (fsck?) claimed that some time stamp was in the future, did some tweaking, rebooted computer and kubuntu started well. -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-17 Thread Heikki Mäntysaari
Happened to me also (Kubuntu 7.04 daily build 20070417). During the first boot fsck checked root partition and told me that it had found some errors and then rebooted my machine. I had set my system to GMT+2 time zone. -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-16 Thread Philip Wyett
I get this also when installing the 7.04 betas and the RC. My system is set to the current time here in the UK. The live CD is booting -1 hour and during installation it comes to current time. Upon reboot the system is forcing fsck because the timestamp for the last mount is in the past.

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-16 Thread Philip Wyett
It seems the issue is that the installer is not correct. You set the time zone to London and you get BST+1, when really it should be GMT+1 I believe. BST in the installer seems to be = GMT + 1 + 1 -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-04-14 Thread Renzo Bagnati
This happened to me also, after installing ubuntu 7.04 beta in an already partitioned hard drive (/dev/sda9, local time Rome/Italy). -- fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 43239] Re: fsck should check against a timestamp 49710 days old

2007-03-25 Thread Andi T.
The problem still exists using Kubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) Beta x86 Desktop CD. BIOS time/CMOS time is set to local time (Berlin/Germany). After booting the Desktop CD (the clock shows the correct local time) I started the Installation, chose Berlin/Germany in step 2 of 6 and re- formatted the