No, it doesn't. In 5.4.1.2, a later download still waits until an
earlier installation has finished.
** Attachment added: screenshot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/438870/+attachment/3463799/+files/queue.png
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
I believe this works now in more recent versions?
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
I started to work on a threading branch which would provide the base for
this. Michael also sees an use case in splitting updates into smaller
transactions.
** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/threading
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
You're probably right that downloading for more than one transaction at
a time wouldn't be worth it. (It might save time if the downloads were
from different servers, because some of the latency might be at the
server's end rather than the client's. But in our case they will mostly
be from the
the download cache (archives) is locked during every operation
Well then, what would it take to fix that? A change in apt, I guess?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
You don't want a fix but a new feature. apt is completely transaction
unaware - so this must be implemented in a level above apt (aptdaemon).
But is it really worth the effort? How much time would we really safe?
It only makes sense to start the next download during the installation
phase of the
We could extract the to be downloaded packages during simulate and
download them in the background. Since the download cache (archives) is
locked during every operation we would have to add a secondary cache.
Seems to get quite complicated. We would also have to deal with enabling
additional
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
To
I've now mentioned this in the specification.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter#bug-438870
Ideally, this shouldn't require any code changes to USC itself, just to
aptdaemon and apt. USC should request every task immediately, if it
doesn't do that already. apt should be able to do the
This will need only work in aptdaemon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
yes !!! thanks guy , it is not fixed yet but thanks for the attention
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Michael Vogt
michael.v...@ubuntu.comwrote:
This will need only work in aptdaemon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
duplicate bug report (713137).
It still doesnt do it and is still wishlist and isnt being worked on id
say leave it as is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
Downloads should start when the previous one
Shane, any update on this issue ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
Title:
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Shane, I've assigned this to me only so I can add it to the
specification, so feel free to implement it! I just need to know a
couple of things:
1. Can the installation script for package A make package B
uninstallable in a way that dpkg would normally know before downloading
package B? Or is
1. I would think the latter.
2. If package B requires package A and B fails it should stop
downloading because a newer version of B that may be required might
depend on a newer version of A. In that way the user doesnt waste
bandwidth downloading something they my not need.
--
Downloads should
@shane: Help is certainly welcome, I like the idea, it should not be too
hard, but requies a bit of work.
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Sure ill attach a patch when its done.
--
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
--
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
mpt if you want I could help with a patch
--
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32685781/Dependencies.txt
--
Downloads should start when the previous one ends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
20 matches
Mail list logo
