[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2021-06-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051]

2021-06-04 Thread Niklasbetz20
this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051]

2021-06-04 Thread Marja Erwin
are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051 Title: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2012-12-23 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051 Title: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 440051]

2012-07-11 Thread Samuel Sidler
Title: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2012-07-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051]

2012-07-10 Thread Chrismore-bugzilla
. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051 Title: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2012-07-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2009-10-02 Thread Micah Gersten
Thank you for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the developers of the software. You can track it at: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519417 ** Summary changed: - 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually + Firefox

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

2009-10-02 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: firefox Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 440051] [NEW] 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 After installing today's updates in Jaunty, when first opening Firefox I get a greeting with this message: You should update Adobe Flash Player right now. Firefox is up to date, but your current version of Flash Player can cause security

[Bug 440051] Re: 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32781786/Dependencies.txt -- 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 440051] Re: 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
My current version is 10.0 r22. http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ suggests I get version 10.0.32.18, and let me download a .deb which fails manual installation with this error: package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64) -- 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated

[Bug 440051] Re: 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
It seems there is a corresponding, up-to-date 10.0.32.18 version of Flash for 64-bit Linux systems. It's not packaged, though, and it's still alpha: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html For an example on how to download/install this, see:

[Bug 440051] Re: 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Micah Gersten
Thank you for reporting this to Ubuntu. We do not support the 64 bit version of flash in Ubuntu at present. Please subscribe to bug 326555 to find out when we will. Firefox correctly noted that your flash is out of date as 10.0.32.18 is the latest version. Please report any other issues you

[Bug 440051] Re: 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to download/install manually

2009-10-01 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
Micah, if we don't support Flash 64 bit, we shouldn't allow Firefox to propose upgrading/installing things manually. This bug is about Firefox proposing the upgrade, not about supporting 64-bit Flash. Tx. for the link. -- 64-bit Firefox complains my Flash version is outdated and proposes to