#24 > Using inotifywait on /proc works fine too.
False, it does not notify you of new entries (like new processes
launched). Try the program below for proof; launch it and run "sleep
999" and you will not see the PID of your new sleep appear printed out.
Using inotify with /proc/ will probably n
I have tested this on Ubuntu 13.04 and it is working fine:
sworddragon@ubuntu:~/data$ sleep 20 &
[1] 3009
sworddragon@ubuntu:~/data$ ls /proc/3009
attr cgroup comm cwd fd latency map_files
mountinfo netoom_adjpagemap sched smaps sta
I am facing this same issue on other linux distros. The most I could
find about it was in a linux-kernel thread from 2006. At that time the
kernel was not designed to support inotify on proc. Hopefully ubuntu can
make some progress. There were some proposals for alternate methods in
the thread, may
Hi Joseph
it is a bit sad to spend time to isolate a bug, file it, provide all
the additional data asked, see it "confirmed" and then see that it has
been dropped because bug fixing has taken so much time as to make the
OS release obsolete.
Anyway, knowing that bugs that are not resolved in one Li
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so
is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported
series, please file a new bug.
This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since
this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work,
I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here.
Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
S
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Compile the following program (inotifyerr.c)
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
int fd = inotify_init();
if (fd == -1){
perror("inotify_init");
}
Hello Angelo
can you please run in a terminal:
apport-collect 454722
Thanks
Fabio
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
** Tags added: karmic lucid
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Hi Fabio,
yes, the same problem occurs in lucid. I have tested it right now and have
seen that
inotify does not work as expected.
-Angelo
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Hello Angelo
is this problem present with the latest updated Karmic's or Lucid's packages?
Thanks in advance
Fabio
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
inotify does not watch /proc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454722
You received this bug notification because you are a me
13 matches
Mail list logo