[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-07 Thread Nikola M
Well, seems we will need to do something to see SM 2.x in Ubuntu in 10.10 release, anyway. So clock is ticking for 10.10 from now on. Lets `hop in` and do something. Rechner-Tester, if you want do do something about it, i am willing to also do something about it and to work with Joe Lesko. PPA

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-07 Thread Nomax
@ Nikola M: It's because Mozilla website only host 32-bit versions of those plugins. For Lightning, you have to use this build: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/releases/1.0b1/contrib/linux-x86_64/lightning.xpi -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-05 Thread Wladimir Mutel
Both ones not going to happen: SM 2.0 in lucid , as well as SM 1.1 out of lucid. Wait till Lucid release at the end of April so you could check by yourself. Then read comment #20 again - it's truth. -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-05 Thread Rechner-Tester
Wladimir: Also I'm afraid you're right saying 1.1.17 is going to ship with lucid, just saying process is King without any further arguments isn't enough to solve a problem. And it's the truth that there is a problem with SM in Ubuntu: - SM 2.0.0 was released on 27. oct 09, 2 days before carmic

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-04 Thread Rechner-Tester
As I allready wrote in #542750 Since SM 2.0 is out since month, lucid definitly should ship the newer version! -SM 1.1.17 isn't up to date. The last 1.1 is 1.1.19 -SM 1.1 at all is completely outdated since at least 1/2 year. There are many unfixed security issues and we won't see any fixes.

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-04 Thread Wladimir Mutel
Not going to happen just on your will. It's Ubuntu, and Process is the King there. Use the above mentioned PPA and don't try to demand anything from the mainline. -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-04-04 Thread Rechner-Tester
What won't happen? SM 2.0 in lucid? Yes I know there is nearly now chance because feature freeze is reached. But what is the alternative? Shipping SM 1.1.x for the next 3 years? I think it's better not shipping SM at all. That's my point. -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-03-16 Thread NoOp
As an FYI: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2010-03-16 /quote March 16, 2010 Support For SeaMonkey 1.x Dropped In January 2006, SeaMonkey 1.0 was released, a 1.1 release followed a year later. Another three years later, the SeaMonkey project is discontinuing support for the SeaMonkey 1.x

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-03-16 Thread NoOp
** Changed in: seamonkey (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-02-27 Thread Nikola M
So far, I have tested 2.0.2 that I got previously fropm your PPA and it works just fine on Hardy/8.04LTS/64-bit. Maybe you could bring it back inside PPA since it is Ok? Also I am eager to see 2.0.3 and to finally switch to SM2 from 1.1.17. There is now officialy contributed Seamonkey 2.0.3

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-02-11 Thread Joe Lesko
Seamonkey 2.0.3 is being released next week and Mozilla.org was nice enough to have the source files tagged in revision control, so I rebuilt Seamonkey 2.0.3 without much effort. There are something like 22 security fixes and 100+ bug fixes, I think the way the package builds is the way it should

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-02-04 Thread NoOp
Ran the litmus tests for hardy, jaunty karmic (32bit), and karmic 64bit without issues. Note: I did not post the tests on the litmus site, but instead ran them individually. I've also been using the karmic 32 64bit builds on my daily work machines w/o issue. Any possibility that these ppa

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-29 Thread NoOp
Installs from the PPA to hardy, jaunty karmic (32bit) all went w/out issue. I'll test the hardy karmic's with the standard Mozilla litmus tests: https://litmus.mozilla.org/run_tests.cgi?test_run_id=7 - only thing I can't test is w/imap as I do not have an imap account. Again, thanks for these

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-28 Thread Wladimir Mutel
It would be also great to add SM2.0 as an alternative to x-www-browser SM1.1 did that. Now I have to do it by hand. like : update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-www-browser x-www-browser /usr/bin/seamonkey-2.0 130 -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-28 Thread Nikola M
I am downloading it (at a slow rate, something is wrong at me with downl. speed from ppa) after i test , I will post findings -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-28 Thread Joe Lesko
Wladimir Mutel: Thanks. Sounds like a great idea. I'll add update- alternatives today. -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-28 Thread NoOp
Testing http://ppa.launchpad.net/joe-nationnet/ppa-seamonkey2/ubuntu/pool/main/s/seamonkey-2.0/ [[ ]seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu4-joe1~karmic_amd64.deb] and all appears to be working, including java (Version 6 Update 18) and flash 10.0 r42). Picked up my bookmarks

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-27 Thread Joe Lesko
Nikola M: I posted the orig.tar.gz and diff.gz files for hardy, jaunty, karmic and lucid. I have tried the stable release on all by hardy as I don't have a hardy system available at this time. Launchpad built all the packages for each of the releases. I even put some daily files out there that are

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2010-01-11 Thread Nomax
@Nikola M: I tried but then SeaMonkey 1.1.17 crashed upon loading any Flash content. @Joe Lesko: Awesome! It works great!!! Thanks! -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-12-18 Thread Joe Lesko
I just added a ppa for Seamonkey 2.0.1. I'm a huge fan of Seamonkey and had the same problem with needing the amd64 version. I used the original source code from seamonkey 2.0.1 and just had to add the debian build files. It installs as seamonkey-2.0 and both versions of the browser (1.1.17 and

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-12-18 Thread Nikola M
Wow, that is great Joe Lesko! ;) Great news! :) Thank you! ;) But as I see there is no orig.tar.gz and separate diff.gz files? @Nomax, try installing Adobe 64 bit flash player 10 for Linux, from adobe site. Works fine on 1.1.17 on my Hardy 64bit install ;) -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-12-14 Thread Nomax
Upgrading package to SeaMonkey 2 (even in backports) becomes quite urgent because of... Flash! I don't know for 32-bit, but on 64-bit platforms, Adobe Flash plugin on SeaMonkey 1.1.7 behaves inconsistently. Web pages with embedded flash animations (e.g. adverts) sometimes freeze the browser,

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-12-08 Thread Nikola M
NoOp Please stop saying that. You are NOT right. You were just saying that there IS ONE maintainer. Your Idea is BAD, Insulting to all Seamonkey and previous Mozilla and Netscape users over years. Seamonkey 1.1.17 IS CURRENT release (.1.1.18 bring nothing interesting to update). 2.0 is NEW

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-12-07 Thread NoOp
It doesn't appear that anyone is keeping the SeaMonkey updated: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey Maintainer: Ubuntu-Mozilla-Team https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozillateam quote Ubuntu-Mozilla-Team does not use Launchpad. This page was created on 2007-07-30 when the

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-11-28 Thread Suspicious1
FYI, a re-branded version of SeaMonkey 2.0 is already available within the Debian Testing repositories: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/iceape-browser -- Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 461864] Re: Add Seamonkey 2.0 to Ubuntu

2009-10-27 Thread Uncle Spellbinder
I agree whole heartedly! The official 2.0 release was 10-27-09. From what I've read, SeaMonkey 1.1xx will receive bug fixes for a time and then languish into obscurity. In any event, the most current is 2.0 and I believe it should be included in Ubuntu ASAP. Hopefully I'll be able to get it via