[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-09-08 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
I am using a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server and have used virt-manager to set up an NFS storage repository (located on another machine). On boot the storage fails to mount. First it was failing with statd not running and I fixed that by editing /etc/init/statd.conf making this change:

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-05-29 Thread Michael Palmer
Hi Steve, Thanks for your work on this. Just to make sure you understand (since you mentioned the problem doesn't happen for you). this bug is not just about warning messages... It actually drops you into the rescue shell, and the boot process stops there, waiting for console input. This

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-04-28 Thread Loïc Minier
Is this still an issue in lucid final? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-04-28 Thread Steve Langasek
There aren't any known remaining reliability problems in lucid regarding stacked NFS mounts, and I don't think we'll go back now to document this in the release notes for 9.10. Marking wontfix. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New = Won't Fix -- retry remote devices when

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-04-01 Thread John Franklin
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mountall - Hi, + Hi, I have a similar problem like in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/461133 . My NFS-Shares are not mounted at boot time. But I don't think both problems have the same cause. I think my problem is

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-30 Thread Alvin
Meanwhile we have bug 548954. I'm glad other people agree that hiding boot messages on servers is a bad idea. The bug is even marked critical, but why is this one not critical? Only because it is 'hard to fix' in Karmic? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-25 Thread Alvin
The bug about the messages is bug 504224. Steve, I hope you mean the reason for the messages will be gone in Lucid and not: don't worry, we'll cover the messages with a nice looking boot splash. Older Unix admins will have a heart attack if they see a boot splash on a server OS. -- retry

Re: [Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:03:50PM -, Alvin wrote: Steve, I hope you mean the reason for the messages will be gone in Lucid No, I do not. and not: don't worry, we'll cover the messages with a nice looking boot splash. They're *already* covered in lucid on systems which support the boot

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-24 Thread Brian Morton
I was running into this issue on Karmic and now I have tried Lucid Beta 1. The behavior here is a little different because the shares do mount on startup, but error messages are still displayed in the terminal. mount.nfs: DNS resolution failed for hostname: Name or service not known mountall:

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Brian, The mount.nfs messages are shown if you aren't using the graphical splash, but this should also be resolved in the next upload of plymouth to lucid. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-24 Thread Brian Morton
Thanks for the helpful info. I'll make sure to report back after that package is updated. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-03-12 Thread Rory McCann
I was affected by this on my karmic box. My work around was to add noauto to the /etc/fstab line for the NFS mount, and then add mount /path/to/mount in /etc/rc.local. This means that the directory would get mounted at start up, but at the end. This worked for my situation. -- retry remote

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-23 Thread K Mori
I am/was also affected by this. I run a home network with a main nfs server and 4 diskless clients which need root over nfs as well as other nfs mounts. I have been able to keep this setup going since Dapper until this past upgrade to Karmic. After struggling with this for the last 2 days I

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-11 Thread Russel Winder
Steve, It seems as though Network Manager is as big a crock of as it ever was -- at least for workstations that are either connected via eth0 or not connected at all. I purged Network Manager and added the appropriate lines to /etc/network/interfaces and now when I boot I get the same

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Network Manager is supposed to bring up wired network connections at boot time. If this isn't happening for you, then that's either a bug in network-manager or a configuration problem of some sort. I would encourage you to file a bug report on network-manager about that issue. I agree with you

Re: [Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-11 Thread Alvin
On 11/02/2010 14:06, Steve Langasek wrote: Most users of NFS (including myself) have seen no such problem in karmic, aside from the warning that the NFS mounts are not yet available - messages which I believe are being suppressed in lucid. My experience is different. Out of 10 NFS clients,

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-10 Thread Russel Winder
I have a workstation with a fresh Karmic install and am seeing that all my NFS mounts are failing at boot time with this same message: One or more of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab cannot yet be mounted: . . . Press ESC to enter a recovery shell. Other bug reports using the same

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-10 Thread Russel Winder
Actually, I don't have eth0 which is why DNS isn't working and also why nothing will work on the network. So why is the boot sequence trying to mount NFS mounts before the network interface is started? So how do I get the eth0 interface started so that the machine can boot sensibly? -- retry

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Russel, This bug is not about trying to mount NFS mounts before the network is up. That's expected behavior, and does not affect the reliability of NFS mounts at boot time. If your eth0 isn't coming up, then of course NFS mounts will fail; you should determine why your network isn't being

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-26 Thread Jürgen Sauer
This Bug is a very, very critical and nasty problem (a K.O.) criteria für karmic use in commercial environments. This is a mission critical bug, which makes karmic and so ubuntu unusable ins coperorate standard setups. It must fixed. J. Sauer -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-26 Thread Dan
** Tags added: verification-needed -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-12 Thread Alvin
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-12 Thread Alvin
Subscribing ubuntu-release-notes because upgrading in environments that rely on NFS might not be a good idea. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-09 Thread Dan
The attached patch is sufficient to fix this bug for me in Karmic, but is probably not a very good long-term solution. It simply sets the ready flag of each remote filesystem after SIGUSR1 is received, before attempting to mount them all. ** Attachment added: Mark all remote filesystems ready

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-08 Thread ianc
Well, I'm a home user, I'm affected - and the issue is a right PITA... Karmic's inability to mount NFS drives at boot is a major regression. So if the mechanism for solving the problem is an SRU then I vote for that solution too please. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
I believe an SRU is unfortunately not practical here because the fix is intertwined with significant architectural changes to mountall that can't be backported to 9.10. Scott, please correct me if I'm wrong. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-07 Thread Johan Walles
Since I have to boot via a rescue shell nowadays, I filed bug 504271 requesting a fix for this issue in Karmic. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-07 Thread Alvin
Is it possible that this issue also affects mounting CIFS filesystems at boot? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-07 Thread Johan Walles
This is a request for an SRU. This bug prevents machines from booting if home directories are on NFS. My machine was able to boot Jaunty so this is a regression. Not being able to boot is severe. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates, SRUs are issued: * to fix high-impact

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-05 Thread Alvin
Without a fix, a lot of servers using NFS can't even boot unattended. Isn't that important enough for a separate fix? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-05 Thread Jason Straight (LeeJunFan)
My local library is setup to netboot 30 workstations, which won't boot well with karmic. -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-04 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 11:52 +, Patrick wrote: When is this going to be fixed in karmic? It isn't. Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-04 Thread Dan
When is this going to be fixed in karmic? It isn't. Um, but my nested NFS mounts don't work in Karmic. Or should I build a backport of mountall from Lucid for my machines? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2010-01-04 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 18:14 +, Dan wrote: When is this going to be fixed in karmic? It isn't. Um, but my nested NFS mounts don't work in Karmic. Or should I build a backport of mountall from Lucid for my machines? A Lucid backport won't work, you'd need to backport more than just

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2009-12-31 Thread Patrick
When is this going to be fixed in karmic? -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2009-12-21 Thread Scott James Remnant
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = lucid-alpha-2 ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott James Remnant (scott) -- retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

[Bug 470776] Re: retry remote devices when parent is ready after SIGUSR1

2009-12-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mountall - 2.0 --- mountall (2.0) lucid; urgency=low [ Scott James Remnant ] * mount event changed to mounting, to make it clear it happens before the filesystem is mounted. Added mounted event which happens afterwards. * Dropped the