[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-10-05 Thread Steve Alexander
This bug has three duplicates, each of which is for a specific card. So, those bugs were marked duplicates of this one... and now you've marked this bug invalid because it is not specific enough. That seems kind of inconsistent, if you see what I mean. -- Some drivers do not work with

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-10-04 Thread Alexander Sack
this bug is far too generic. Please open a new bug for your specific driver if you still see issues. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48473 You received

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-09-23 Thread Kourosism
I am getting a possibly related issue with my Advent 7113 laptop, which has an inbuilt MSI 6877 WLAN. It can see the network just fine, but cannot connect - this is true for WPA authentication as well as WEP and open networks, although other users have suggested they have succeeded by using WPA on

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-09-23 Thread Alexander Sack
Can you please test if this is still an issue for you with latest gutsy live cd? -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-05-24 Thread Nick Moffitt
Please disregard my previous comments. It turns out that there was a miscommunication about the spelling of the WPA password, and I was trying the wrong one on all of the systems I listed above. The feedback for this failure was lacking, so I assumed it was a NM bug. I am now successfully

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-05-05 Thread Steve Alexander
As commented in bug 53788 (a duplicate of this one), I'm seeing a related problem with a Sitecom WL-171 (RaLink RT2561/RT61), and NetworkManager Applet 0.6.4. I can use the wireless network just fine if I connect using dhclient ra0. However, I can't get network manager to actually connect, even

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-04-25 Thread Nick Moffitt
I believe that I have observed this bug on several similar systems. Feisty is unable to connect to a WPA network (appearing to timeout/blacklist as described) on a variety of thinkpads that I have encountered on the same wireless network. These laptops have the following wireless network devices

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-04-25 Thread Nick Moffitt
One little addendum to my previous entry. I'm not sure if it is relevant, but I believe that all of these systems were upgraded from Edgy. My own system switched to feisty shortly before the Beta release, and was in fact able to connect to WPA networks on several occasions in mid-to-late March.

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-04-11 Thread Michael Trausch
The rt74 driver, which is required for adequate functioning with my adapter, also fails to work with NetworkManager due to this issue. (My problem's history is in bug 104382, which I just found the rt74 driver as a workaround for.) I am using Ubuntu Feisty. -- Some drivers do not work with

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-02-02 Thread Alan
I had the wpasupplicant from Trevino's repos installed, and after downgrading to 0.5.4-5, WEP encryption now works. Trevino's repos had version 0.5.7+3v1ubuntu5 (http://3v1n0.tuxfamily.org/dists/edgy/3v1n0/index.html). Perhaps some update between those two caused this? -- Some drivers do not

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2007-01-31 Thread Alan
me too, orinoco_cs. I'll try downgrading wpa_supplicant. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-11-25 Thread Chris Wagner
Scott Robinson: Have you created that wiki page for working NetworkManager configurations yet? Thanks. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-05 Thread Scott Robinson
Bug 42504 and 46136 are the same bug. (but not marked as duplicate for historical / versioning reasons) Since you keep making casual reads as opposed to understand the problem, let me describe it here in detail to resolve your curiousity: In dapper, the version of ndiswrapper is only partially

Re: [Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-05 Thread Simon80
Thanks, that explanation greatly clarifies the issue - not knowing much about wpasupplicant, I assumed that reverting to wireless extensions meant doing away with wpasupplicant altogether, and spoke too soon. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-04 Thread Scott Robinson
** Summary changed: - [dapper] Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. + Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-04 Thread Bernat Tallaferro
Does this issue still occur for anyone using Edgy? Basically, what cards don't quite work with wpasupplicant yet? Yes, this still happens in Edgy. If I understood it correctly, it is a driver-related issue. On my particular case, I am using the open source acx driver shipped in ubuntu and I am

Re: [Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-04 Thread Simon80
Ndiswrapper doesn't work with wpasupplicant, I think, but I haven't tried in a couple of months, I just downgraded NM and let it be. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-04 Thread Scott Robinson
Correct, ndiswrapper doesn't work but for a reason in NM that is being fixed bug 46136. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 48473] Re: Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.

2006-10-04 Thread Simon80
The fix in NM in that bug is to use wireless extensions instead of wpasupplicant with ndiswrapper, in effect confirming what I just said. Bug 42504 seems to be about ndiswrapper not working with wpasupplicant, at a glance. -- Some drivers do not work with wpasupplicant, and therefore NM.