Actually, syncing to libparted 2.x would be more useful. It has lots of
new features (e.g. disks with uncommon sector sizes now work) and is
supposedly not stable, but it's also the first version of libparted
that has tests proving it really works as intended, so it's probably at
least as stable
Thanks James :) But Parted in the repos is still at 1.8.8, while 1.9.0
is already out for several months. And the version of Parted in the
repos is a GIT release (which is not fully stable). So can you sync
Parted 1.9.0 as well or do you want me to open another [needs-
packaging]-report for that
What does ACKed mean?
--
Please sync gparted 0.5.0-1(main) from debian unstable main
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Anyone willing to package this for 10.04?
--
Please sync gparted 0.5.0-1(main) from debian unstable main
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ACKed.
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
Please sync gparted 0.5.0-1(main) from debian unstable main
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Also, parted-1.9.0 has to be synced too for 0.5.0 to work correctly.
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please sync gparted 0.5.0-1(main) from debian unstable main
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500956
You received this bug notification because you are a member
