[Bug 522672] Re: Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-08-25 Thread Hew McLachlan
Should ubuntu-sponsors be subscribed to merge requests? I thought that was only for syncs. -- Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 522672] Re: Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-08-25 Thread Artur Rona
If you will attach patch to merge, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors. Now someone else has uploaded merge some time ago, so this bug is out- of-date. -- Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522672 You received this bug notification

[Bug 522672] Re: Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-08-24 Thread Artur Rona
In future please subscribe ubuntu-sponsors. Now this report is useless. ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522672 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 522672] Re: Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-05-23 Thread Iustin Pop
For the record, 2.3.0 has not migrated to testing since if has critical bugs (it doesn't work on ARM). I don't know if Ubuntu cares [about ARM], but I'd like to point that the new version in Debian has significant bugs. regards, iustin -- Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian

[Bug 522672] Re: Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-02-16 Thread Hew McLachlan
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- Please merge protobuf 2.3.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --