Fix released in Lucid since Ubuntu-2.6.32-23.37
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
Title:
ecryptfs
this seems not to be a UCK bug to me
** Changed in: uck
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 567945 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567945
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 567945
problems whit uck pakage manager
* You can subscribe to bug 567945 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/uck/+bug/567945/+subscribe
--
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 567945
problems whit uck pakage manager
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Also affects: uck
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Is this also a Problem on ntfs mounts?
I ask this because I get in huge trouble on a hardy-lucid do-release-upgrade
-m desktop -d, I think now due to a move of the /usr/share/doc to a ntfs
partition because I had not enough space in /usr for the upgrade.
I symlinked the doc-folder on the ntfs
Indeed, that's how I noticed this problem. UCK does not work on eCryptfs
homedirs...
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Users of UbuntuCustomizationKit with encrypted home might have similar
problems. Bug #567945 eventually could be a duplicate of this bug.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This is still a problem in Lucid-rc
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3a60a1686f0d51c99bd0df8ac93050fb6dfce647
has been queued for 2.6.32 stable updates and will be picked up in Lucid
in due course.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
I pushed a fix for this into 2.6.34-rc5 and cc'ed stable:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3a60a1686f0d51c99bd0df8ac93050fb6dfce647
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
So this should be fixed in Ubuntu Maverick (or if we cherrypick this fix
from -stable) for Lucid.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm affected by this in Ubuntu Karmic. I run scratchbox
http://www.scratchbox.org/ in an encrypted partitions, and dpkg
1.15.5.5+maemo3+0m6 fails with the same error. I run ecryptfs
81-0ubuntu3.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Tags added: kernel-series-unknown
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Is anybody working on a patch already? I've just been hit by this issue
as well. My poor workaround is to run the debootstrap in /tmp.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Yes, I was running it fine a couple days of earlier, but we did get a
dpkg update on 14 Feb.
The assert was committed on Sep 2009 in dpkg:
- do {
-varbufextend(symlinkfn);
-r= readlink(fnamevb.buf,symlinkfn.buf,symlinkfn.size);
-if (r0) ohshite(_(unable to read link
On 02/26/2010 02:58 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to consistently return unencrypted
sizes/metadata for all syscalls on ecryptfs files?
I agree with you. I think it is reasonable to check if the file is a
symlink and then attempt to decrypt the target. If that's
** Also affects: ecryptfs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tyler Hicks (tyhicks)
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink
I don't believe this is a regression caused by the fix in bug #390833.
The only change that fix made was to the st_blocks field of the stat
struct.
The problem that Loïc is seeing is that return value of readlink() and
st_size don't match. As far as I can tell, that has always been the
case
I think the regression was caused by the fix for bug #390833.
--
ecryptfs breaks lstat/readlink size assumption
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Argh, what a mess...
Well, bug #390833 has a work around, albeit inconvenient. ie, users
must use du --apparent-size ...
I'm CC'ing Tyler here, since he's the author of the upstream patch and
will want to know about this.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
23 matches
Mail list logo
