Yes, please do.
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 08:42 +, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> It has landed in unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dlr-languages.html
> Should I rename it to "Please sync"?
>
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received th
It has landed in unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dlr-languages.html
Should I rename it to "Please sync"?
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
er, the package has been ACCEPTED, I mean ;)
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
dlr-languages is now in NEW
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481431#18
I assume that the next step is to petition an archive admin?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #481431
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481431
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Deb
Thanks doko.
The last rejection was due to my lack of complete licensing information,
btw. It's been updated and has had a bit more review this time around.
My fingers are crossed for a go-ahead from ftp-masters.
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52
last time the package was rejected by Debian's ftp-masters; maybe wait
until the packge is accepted. there's no reason to have it not in lcuid.
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
SYN
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:38 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'd like an explicit ack from doko that we want this.
>
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
I'd like an explicit ack from doko that we want this.
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
while I think the risk is pretty low, it still would need to go through
new. If you can find an archive admin willing to take the job, I'm ok
with getting it in.
--
[FFe] for dlr-languages sync from Debian NEW
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525547
You received this bug notification because you a