** Tags added: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535054
Title:
Shouldn't use SIGILL to detect NEON
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Tags added: arm-porting-queue
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535054
Title:
Shouldn't use SIGILL to detect NEON
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Also, IIRC, SIGILL isn't thread safe.
** Changed in: x264 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: x264 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
Shouldn't use SIGILL to detect NEON
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535054
You received this bug notification because you are a
Also worth commenting that SIGILL detection will give the wrong result
on iMX51 when the kernel tries to report NEON as absent but the hardware
has it; and also the test is unreliable where the hardware has NEON but
the kernel was built with CONFIG_NEON=n.
So, lots of reasons...
IIRC, the above
The patches might have to be rebased on top of the latest x264 package;
they should also be discussed with upstream.
--
Shouldn't use SIGILL to detect NEON
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535054
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
