I played with CouchDB in Ubuntu 10.04. Later on, after the installation,
configuring CouchDB, and first play, I did automatic update.
xulrunner was updated from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.10 to
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.12
It impacted CouchDB too much (query functionality is not working).
This
This should only happen if you modified your system with this type of
symlink. If couchdb breaks on an upgrade and you did not modify
your system, please file a bug against couchdb.
On 11/19/2010 02:47 PM, eventissimus wrote:
I played with CouchDB in Ubuntu 10.04. Later on, after the
The reasoning is apparently that xulrunner doesn't have a stable ABI and
isn't versioned meaningfully. This is probably a complaint that should
be taken up with Mozilla.
--
xulrunner + dynamic linker run-time bindings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557275
You received this bug notification
I've heard, paraphrasing: The ABI of xulrunner is unstable, and the
library is unversioned. We can't support installs and upgrades for the
three or five years that we say we will.
--
xulrunner + dynamic linker run-time bindings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557275
You received this bug
Chris,
Why it's deliberately not installed in the search path like other libs? It make
distributions of application relying on xulrunner difficult on ubuntu.
Even you CouchDB package uses an ugly hack by changing search path when
it start.SO please elaborrate.
--
xulrunner + dynamic linker
Thank you for your bug report. xulrunner is deliberately not installed
in to the default search path, so it wouldn't make sense for us to do
this change (we may as well just ship it in the default path if we
wanted applications to link to it at runtime in the usual way)
** Changed in:
Chris,
Could you elaborate a bit? Why is it the case for xulrunner that applications
should not be able to link to it in the usual way?
--
xulrunner + dynamic linker run-time bindings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I have also encountered this problem, and can confirm that the fix
suggested by the bug submitter corrects the problem. However, I don't
believe that it's necessary to include the /usr/lib/xulrunner-
devel-1.9.2.2 directory in the xulrunner.conf file, since it contains no
shared libraries (and
Moving to xulrunner-1.9.2. I'll look into this, thank you for the
suggestion.
** Package changed: xulrunner-1.9 (Ubuntu) = xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =
