[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2010-02-28 Thread Ryan
I should also point out that the last time upstream merged the AoTuv fork was AoTuv beta 2, to produce Xiph.org libvorbis 1.1, this was back in 2004. AoTuv beta 5.7, released March of 2009 is now the current release, with maybe a new one on the way too. (test builds anyway) How long is it reasona

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2010-02-28 Thread Ryan
@Anzenketh: As said a few times in this report, they want to wait for upstream to actually merge it. Which is perfectly understandable if upstream will ever actually merge it. Sebastian Dröge may have been under the impression that this merger was going to be forthcoming (as of the end of 2006), b

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2010-02-28 Thread Anzenketh
Added Debian Upstream. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #419890 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419890 ** Also affects: libvorbis (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419890 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Should include aoT

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2010-01-23 Thread Lionel Le Folgoc
** Changed in: medibuntu Status: New => Invalid -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2009-10-24 Thread bmhm
I'd like to give this bug another chance. Артём Попов did a build of aotuv. ** Also affects: medibuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2008-10-27 Thread Chris Clonch
Seems like this one has gone stagnat for a while. Any plans (upstream or otherwise) to move to the aoTUV patched releases? -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2008-05-01 Thread Артём Попов
Just tried building the latest Hardy libvorbis with aoTuV patch, builds and runs very nice in fact :) Here's the debdiff against Debian/Hardy package, and the binaries may be found in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~artfwo/+archive ** Attachment added: "libvorbis_1.2.0.dfsg-2ubuntu1~ppa1.debdiff"

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2007-02-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: libvorbis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://launchpad.net/bugs/57797 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2006-12-15 Thread Igor Goldenberg
Well, will wait merging by upstream. Thank you for the info. -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://launchpad.net/bugs/57797 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2006-12-15 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Upstream is aware of this patchset and wants to merge it at some point. We will wait until then because we can't do as extensive tests as necessary to really guarantee complete compatibility and no quality regressions. -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://launchpad.net/bugs/57797 --

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2006-12-15 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Thanks, I'll take care of this... but will talk to upstream about it first. ** Changed in: libvorbis (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastian Dröge Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch https://launchpad.net/bugs/57797 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing l

[Bug 57797] Re: Should include aoTuV Release 1 patch

2006-08-26 Thread Igor Goldenberg
Yes, it will be very good to have aoTuV version of vorbis library in Ubuntu. As Ogg Vorbis in Linux world is the main lossy audio codec - having best version of it by default in Ubuntu will give great motive to use this brilliant open source and patent free format. It's completely in the spirit