this upload fixes the issue:
gaim (1:2.0.0+beta3.1-1ubuntu8) edgy; urgency=low
.
* debian/control:
- Build-Depends on libmeanwhile-dev (Ubuntu: #58129)
* debian/patches/04_let_crasher_for_apport.patch:
- don't catch crashes, apport does that.
- fixes apport having broken
Main inclusion review result: approved
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportMeanwhile
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I have noticed that gaim-meanwhile package dissapeared from edgy but
gaim still has no meanwhile build-in. What is the status of this bug?
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
it's waiting on the promotion to main of the meanwhile package
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006, vilbara wrote:
I have noticed that gaim-meanwhile package dissapeared from edgy but
gaim still has no meanwhile build-in. What is the status of this bug?
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
A workaround for now is to download the
Yes, gaim is the source package. To produce a gaim-meanwhile binary
package in addition to a gaim binary package, the gaim source
package would need to have Build-Depends: libmeanwhile. libmeanwhile
(or whatever it's called) is in universe, and packages in main can't
depend on packages in
Duplicating the same sources is something we try to not do, the
preferred option is to promote the meanwhile package
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
(main promotion require a code and security review of the package so it
can take some time)
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
meanwhile is an universe package and should be promoted to main before
we can build gaim with it. Subscribing Brandon to the bug who wanted to
write the wiki page for that
** Changed in: gaim (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged = Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
gaim 2.0 missing
Having it for edgy should be no problem but probably not before next
week
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Having it for edgy should be no problem but probably not before next
week
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
Thanks,
That would be great. I'm running Edgy now because Dapper won't work with
multiple IDE
I wonder if it's possible to have gaim in main, but have the meanwhile
plugin in a separate package in meanwhile? Or is that what you mean,
Seb?
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Er, I meant, but have the meanwhile plugin in a separate package in
UNIVERSE.
--
gaim 2.0 missing Sametime protocol
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58129
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Is it okay to have the same source tarball for separate packages (gaim
and gaim-meanwhile)? I think this would be frowned upon if not outright
forbidde. If the meanwhile plugin is built from the gaim source package,
that means the gaim source package would need a Build-Depends on
libmeanwhile, and
I do not know what Ubuntu's policy on this is, but debian uses one
source tarball for multiple binary packages with some regularity.
You can see this for some of the packages that provide both a library
and a binary. Alternately, taking gaim as an example,
15 matches
Mail list logo
