** Changed in: gnome-power
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
Title:
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to
** Changed in: gnome-power
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: gnome-power
Importance: Unknown = Medium
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This has now been fixed in Karmic. now the settings can be set to as low
as 1min also.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Invalid = Fix Committed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You
This is awesome, many thanks!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Just a comment as to what I was doing above:
the 100 papercuts project would like to keep track of their successes
and fixes, and since this bug was rejected from their project we should
keep it as invalid
Once the fix is in Karmic, we can say it is fix released. If it is in
an unreleased bzr
@Scott Howard:
I understand the released/commited , But David Seigel wants the papercuts fixes
to be marked as Fix Commited , for now.
Also when i had marked this initial as confirmed , i felt it was a
trivial fix, and David had overlooked this... hence i marked it fix
commited. But discussed
11 minutes is not a mistake, and is not a trivial change to make
(involves interaction with session idle settings -- see comment).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
Umm! if you think about the average user, even a stmt such as As soon
as computer is idle isn't quite intuitive. For ex: If I'm playing
audio, but not touching keyboard/mouse, is that idle or not? A better
option might be to give an absolute range starting from 1min, but warn
the user, if duration
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New = Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
KDE and Windows have at least two profiles. One for battery and one for ac. If
I want to shutdown the display after one minute in Gnome it is not possible. If
I set the screensaver to one minute shuting down the display is possible after
two minutes but at the same time my screen gets locked
Possible solutions that I propose:
1) Add a duplicate of screensaver-idle settings to gnome-power-preferences
2) Add some text explaining why the lowest value for putting display to sleep
is X.
** Summary changed:
- display sleep time - why 11 minutes
+ display sleep time - why 11 minutes
Just put the screensaver consider idle setting at 1 minute, so then you
can put the display sleep time to as low as 2 minutes.
I don't know why anyone would want it lower than 2 minutes !!!
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes (gnome-power-preferences confusing to the
users)
There is no obvious reason why it should not be possible to set it to
As soon as computer is idle. It would be much more intuitive, that the
left border of the slider is as soon as computer is idle instead of
as soon as computer is idle + 1 minute.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
Ewen McNeill is right.
His bug has been fixed. But this has not.
It's quite hard to figure out where the minimum is coming from. An easy
solution would be to indicate on the form where this minimum is coming from
(like Vassilis Pandis suggested).
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
I prefer 5,
so i think that be able to put a value up to 1 will be ok to everyone
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I prefer 5,
so i think that be able to put a value up to 1 will be ok to everyone
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I suspect the 11 minutes minimum is coming from your
system-preferences-screensaver being set to 11 minutes; the figure
reported in the gnome power manager dialog seems to be offset by the
screensaver amount (even though it doesn't seem to be implemented like
that); I've reported a separate bug
** Changed in: gnome-power
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Could this be at least released to Hardy? The whole separation of ac and
battery makes no sense if screen saver time is the basis. A screen saver
after one minute is very annoying but locking after idle isn't possible
without it.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #427815
On a related point, I'd like to set my laptop to hibernate after a long
period of inactivity - currently this is 11-59 mins. I'd like to be
able to set it to something much larger (like 4 hours). Any chance of a
text entry box in addition to the slider (which can be quite fiddly/slow
to use
Any chance of a text entry box
No, it's against the GNOME HIG.
something much larger (like 4 hours)
Why so long?
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
I still wonder whether +1 minute is accurate. I would rather like my
laptop to put the display to sleep as soon as it is idle and not with a
1 minute delay.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Those interested should also read Bug #36568 and the upstream bugs that
are linked to within that.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This is not be the best solution, but maybe a parenthesis could be added
to the minimum value with something like (see help for more
information).
On a similar note, maybe a label above it that is only visible when the
minimum value is selected ?
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
Please see the help file, in the Preferences section.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Richard, thanks for the pointer. I get it now. Still, isn't this a
little bit cryptic?
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Probably yes. Any idea how to convey the information better?
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I agree as well. 11 is also a weird number ... It could have at least
been 10 . I'm not sure this is a gnome-power-manager, probably belongs
to control-center.
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged = Medium
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
display sleep
Nah, it's gnome-power-manager indeed.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I don't even think 10 is appropriate. The user should have the ability to
bring it down to 1 minute if he so chooses to manage his battery consumption
so aggressively. On my core duo, the display backlight accounts for more
than 40% of total system power consumption, so it makes a big difference
I am just wondering if somewhat 11 got placed somewhere in the code
instead of 1 ???
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 16:51 +, Vassilis Pandis wrote:
I agree as well. 11 is also a weird number ... It could have at least
been 10 . I'm not sure this is a gnome-power-manager, probably belongs
to
I don't know, but sounds likely. On current edgy, I see that the time
has been reduced to 5 min. What's weird is that the .glade file (
/usr/share/gnome-power-manager/gpm-prefs.glade) specifies a minimum
value of 1, not 5.
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
Sorry, should read - Why has the display sleep time ...
--
display sleep time - why 11 minutes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59589
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
This should be against package gnome-power-manager, I think...
But anyway, I agree with wpshooter -- why indeed can't I set my display
shutoff timeout to below 11 minutes, especially given the fact that
there is the time it takes to activate gnome-screensaver before that? In
11 minutes, on
36 matches
Mail list logo
