[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dovecot - 1:1.2.12-0ubuntu3 --- dovecot (1:1.2.12-0ubuntu3) maverick; urgency=low * debian/patches/fix-dovecot-config-parser.patch: Fix ordering of external config files. (LP: #597818) -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Thu, 24 Jun 2010

[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dovecot - 1:1.2.12-0ubuntu3 --- dovecot (1:1.2.12-0ubuntu3) maverick; urgency=low * debian/patches/fix-dovecot-config-parser.patch: Fix ordering of external config files. (LP: #597818) -- Chuck Short zul...@ubuntu.com Thu, 24 Jun 2010

[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-23 Thread Jim Ursetto
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50815216/Dependencies.txt -- Include files parsed in reverse order https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in

[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-23 Thread Serge Hallyn
Note that to back-port the patch, the same line would be found in src/lib-settings/settings.c:155. It looks reasonable to me, though I get the feeling this is something which we would not want to change in lucid (behavioral change), and should get pulled in with a merge in maverick? -- Include

[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-23 Thread Jim Ursetto
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50815216/Dependencies.txt -- Include files parsed in reverse order https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597818 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 597818] Re: Include files parsed in reverse order

2010-06-23 Thread Serge Hallyn
Note that to back-port the patch, the same line would be found in src/lib-settings/settings.c:155. It looks reasonable to me, though I get the feeling this is something which we would not want to change in lucid (behavioral change), and should get pulled in with a merge in maverick? -- Include